Less Than $999 To Go!!
Just A Reminder
Please Don't Forget
To Donate To FR
This Quarter
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Posted on 09/22/2017 11:24:12 AM PDT by fwdude
Almost twenty years ago, both houses of Congress and the American Psychological Association condemned Rind’s claims, published in the August 1998 issue of Psychological Bulletin, that the long-term damages caused by child sexual abuse are overestimated. I would have thought that nearly twenty years, a concurrent resolution of Congress, and a fair bit of social trauma would have convinced him to shift topics.
But I was wrong. His new studies are on the same theme: sex between adults and minors as young as thirteen. Rind is banking on a more amenable political and scholarly atmosphere in which to conclude comparable things. And from the sound of it—or rather, the utter lack of sound—he has gotten his wish. There has been no congressional concern, no APA scrutiny, just silence.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepublicdiscourse.com ...
I remember hearing the ideal situation was for older women to initiate boys into sex, and for older men to initiate girls into sex. Haven’t tried it out, yet.
Trust me, there are a bunch of pedophile “psychologists” involved in this, trying to rationalize and normalize their sick behavior.
Well, that’s certainly true.
I'm sure it is as tight as Hillary's e-mail files.
And many of the perverted people somehow reached Congress. Any congresscritter with a felony on record needs to be sent packing. I don’t care if it’s a DUI. Too Damn Bad! Get lost! We need to hold these congressional bums to a higher standard.
“What is extremely difficult to believe is that our society seems to be on the verge of accepting pedophilia as an orientation within the sex spectrum. This particular issue is where the ties to Kinsey’s research can be fully attested. In an article, Joan A. Nelson, Ed.D., writes in favor of a model of adult-child sexuality in which sex acts with children are to be viewed as acceptable and even essential to the healthy development of the child. “
This biotch needs to be rubbed out!
This story reminds me of that camel’s ass muhammad.
You may remember the fairly recent case of Anna Stubblefield, a tenured Rutgers ethics professor (ethics!) who initiated a sexual relationship with a profoundly mentally and physically disabled man. She claimed she had learned through "facilitated communication" that he was in love with her and wanted to have sex. "Facilitated communication" meant she supported and guided his hand as "he" typed "his" thoughts on a keyboard.
When the disabled man;'s family finally took her to court, they proved to the satisfaction of the jury that she was in fact typing her own thoughts by moving his fingers, an the unfortunate man , incapable of the level of responses of even a preschool child, was being molested without being able to resist, or even comprehend what was happening.
Ethicist Stubblefield was found guilty of criminal molestation and put in prison. But here's the shocker: she is still writing and contributing to academic textbooks on the disabled, and still preaching(to at least some subset of approving peers in the ethic biz) that this was all wonderfully enriching to her diaper-clad, helpless victim.
You heard where?
I don’t remember. It’s been years. The idea may have originated in ancient Greece.
I don’t remember. It’s been years. The idea may have originated in ancient Greece.
I do remember, although I didn’t have that in mind when I typed my overly-optimistic post above.
No, they should be impaled on posts in the public square for all to see.
And many states have provisions in the law to cover that sort of thing. I was a juror in a 'statutory rape' trial, and the whole age of consent business was explained in excruciating detail.
Who did you hear that from, a bunch of pedophiles?
Lets leave my family out of it.
;>)
Your family name is “Post”?
Scratch that ... I mistook what you replied to ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.