Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bannon warns: "end of everything" if Trump supports gun controls
Axios.com ^ | 10-3-2017 | Jonathan Swan

Posted on 10/03/2017 6:38:56 AM PDT by servo1969

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: servo1969

Seriously never passes up a chance to hear the sound of his own voice.

No, you pretentious twit, Trump isn’t going to “support gun controls”, so you can stop concern trolling.


41 posted on 10/03/2017 7:17:35 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

“Bannon is getting a little big for his britches. He needs to STFU with these threats to Trump.”

He buys the smoke people have been blowing up his rear that he was the “actual” president the whole time, and Trump just followed his orders, and with him not there, he needs to dog whistle nonsensical statements like that in order to “scare” people into thinking that what Trumps going to do, and that only the “great Bannon” is standing in the way!


42 posted on 10/03/2017 7:20:13 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0BgLk1i9yY


43 posted on 10/03/2017 7:20:27 AM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools. Go Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

He actually did just walking to Marine One this morning. Reporters asked him about gun control and he said “we’ll be talking about gun control this week”.


44 posted on 10/03/2017 7:21:10 AM PDT by VermithraxPejorative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I notice they left the word “impossible” out of the title.


45 posted on 10/03/2017 7:22:35 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Hillary: Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect 2 billion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Agreed. President Trump campaigned on "shall not be infringed", and that phrase means exactly what it says.

We already have far too many restrictions on that individual, God-given and constitutionally-protected right. The Ctrl-Left wants us disarmed, so they will push their narrative, and they will push their incremental restrictions, even though none of their proposals (other than their goal of complete disarmament) would have saved any lives with this criminal, with Sandy Hook, or with any other mass shooting.

The real issue is mental health, not guns.

46 posted on 10/03/2017 7:22:45 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman

WAPO seems to be hinting that Paddock used bump fire stocks, although they don’t say so outright.


47 posted on 10/03/2017 7:22:50 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

No, Trump has let go those loyal to what he ran on and has placed those against the alleged agenda in place. He is skittish. The people he has working for him should be held accountable by him and he showed confusing moves on DACA.


48 posted on 10/03/2017 7:24:21 AM PDT by VermithraxPejorative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker

Yeah, that’s the quote.


49 posted on 10/03/2017 7:26:22 AM PDT by VermithraxPejorative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

You really happy with people like McMaster, Tillerson, Gary Cohn, etc. in these positions?


50 posted on 10/03/2017 7:29:31 AM PDT by VermithraxPejorative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Hand wringer Bannon, stop withe annoying threats.


51 posted on 10/03/2017 7:31:19 AM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangoLimaSierra

Heh...


52 posted on 10/03/2017 7:33:18 AM PDT by Rebelbase (Orthodox American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Sorry misled by the misleading headline.


53 posted on 10/03/2017 7:34:01 AM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: VermithraxPejorative

It isnt a question of happy with them or not.

I’m just starting to get just as annoyed by this guy.


54 posted on 10/03/2017 7:35:47 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
The Second Amendment is a fact, and not one that even a president can ignore.

Presidents and congressmen have been ignoring it since at least 1934.

55 posted on 10/03/2017 7:38:17 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeWarrior

From what I’ve seen he used a bump stock. legal. Killing people from a hotel from, not so much.


56 posted on 10/03/2017 7:39:08 AM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

How can anyone trash Bannon for any reason? The guy is carrying the nationalist flag for Trump. Nobody in his admin is doing it, the pack of globalist shills....


57 posted on 10/03/2017 7:42:25 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Well that’s better news than if he purchased the weapons outright FA.

Never want to give the left even an inch, but in light of what happened, I’m fine with them outlawing bump stocks. They are a concession to owning proper FA as it is.


58 posted on 10/03/2017 7:44:11 AM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

No it just isn’t Bannon it’s called personality cultist. If ANYTHING remotely critical or even just plainly a fact is uttered towards a revered figure a personality cultist loses their capacity to critically think and immediately turns towards pure emotion I which to base an article an argument even if what was stated was simply fact


59 posted on 10/03/2017 7:48:21 AM PDT by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

2nd Amendment bump for later....


60 posted on 10/03/2017 7:48:53 AM PDT by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson