1 posted on
10/16/2017 3:09:33 PM PDT by
Olog-hai
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Olog-hai
Most unworthy pick for anything ever.
2 posted on
10/16/2017 3:11:05 PM PDT by
Eddie01
To: Olog-hai
Yea, but most of us, including other judges, look at the real world.
To: Olog-hai
Dont anyone say gutterwhore....
4 posted on
10/16/2017 3:12:45 PM PDT by
rrrod
(just an old guy with a gun in his pocket.6l)
To: Olog-hai
She needs to work harder.
5 posted on
10/16/2017 3:13:46 PM PDT by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Olog-hai
As a liberal, Her beliefs are based on emotions. Every waking moment. She “confuses” emotions with application of the law to the facts. It’s easy for her to apply emotions of the moment to facts of the case. She would be perfect in the 9th Circuit, but needs to be kept in check at SCOTUS.
6 posted on
10/16/2017 3:13:54 PM PDT by
Sasparilla
( I'm Not Tired of Winning.)
To: Olog-hai
The wise Latina can STFU.
7 posted on
10/16/2017 3:15:38 PM PDT by
Rummyfan
(In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel.)
To: Olog-hai
"... acknowledge it. I look at it, examine it, try to figure out the effect its having, and then try to adjust my behavior in accordance. STUPID. Interpreting a document, especially the Constitution requires only intellect - she unknowingly revealed that she must try to do her job by adjusting her behaviour! I believe she has disqualified herself by these ridiculous statements, but she has ethnic/female double reinforced Kevlar...
8 posted on
10/16/2017 3:19:30 PM PDT by
heterosupremacist
(Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
To: Olog-hai
Affirmative action hire. Useless in any position in which you have to be indifferent.
9 posted on
10/16/2017 3:30:36 PM PDT by
wastedyears
(Anime is real.)
To: Olog-hai
Libs are 100% Emotional Thinkers.
10 posted on
10/16/2017 3:33:48 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
To: Olog-hai
This is what we get when a light-weight judge gets elevated far above his or her level of competence.
11 posted on
10/16/2017 3:38:12 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Olog-hai
You wouldn’t have all that “turmoil” if you would actually appreciate the US Constitution for what is is.
12 posted on
10/16/2017 3:53:02 PM PDT by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: Olog-hai
“Wise Latina” my culo!
To: Olog-hai
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor told college students in New York City that she sometimes feels great turmoil inside when she is hearing arguments on the bench, but works hard to keep her emotions and personal biases in check...it is interesting that the Newsmax news update before the Howie Carr show this afternoon included a bit about expectations rising that Trump will get to pick several more Supreme Court justices within the next few years because of anticipated retirements - named specifically were Kennedy, Ginsberg, and Sotomayor - Sotomayor because of "health concerns" - is the stress of keeping her bigotry under control getting to her?.....
To: Olog-hai
Blahblah blah.
Wise, my Obamahole.
To: Olog-hai
So basically to preserve the facade of decorum, she has to bite her lip to keep from going off on some race or class based commie tirade, but secretly she wallows in it. That’s what she’s saying.
17 posted on
10/16/2017 4:09:45 PM PDT by
SpaceBar
To: Olog-hai
Asspress Bolshevik promoting alert. Also vomit alert.
18 posted on
10/16/2017 4:13:04 PM PDT by
Luke21
To: Olog-hai
i'd rather have TOMMY Sotomayor than this POS, at least he's up front about his bias
27 posted on
10/16/2017 5:29:46 PM PDT by
Chode
(You have all of the resources you are going to have. Abandon your illusions and plan accordingly.)
To: Olog-hai
As for controlling your emotions, its called not getting involved. Your only job is to asses the basic facts of the case and read the text & history of the WRITTEN law to apply it in the same exact way it was done when the law was written.
Law is either consistently applied in all cases or its not the rule of law but the rule of men in black robes.
A judge cannot channel emotionally or logically the judgement of congress of any period, and certainly not that of the states 220 years ago.
All they can do is read what was written, and repeat what was done.
To: Olog-hai
that’s why you’re not a good pick to be a judge at all.
29 posted on
10/16/2017 7:13:24 PM PDT by
b4me
(God Bless the USA)
To: Olog-hai
31 posted on
10/17/2017 9:37:28 AM PDT by
fwdude
(The perverted left-bound train is always accusing the train station of "moving right.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson