Seems like the false allegation lobby wants to make false allegations more viable.
Last night there was an internet article saying that one of the authors of the Washington Post story has written other stories which proved to be false - false accusations. Is that true?? Certainly someone is investigating to determine whether or not.
As a Jewess on the US, I can only point out that the number of women who allegedly DATED, but had no sex with, Roy Moore is EXACTLY the same number who accused President Clinton of FORCIBLE RAPE, a FAR more serious offense. Now we know why all REAL Americans put our 2nd Amendment FIRST. Just sayin’!
But wait! Where is the evidence?
This is the democrat position on evidence:
“The seriousness of the charge mandates that we investigate this.
Even though there is no evidence, the seriousness of the charge is what matters.”
-- Tom Foley (1929-2013) former Democrat Speaker Of The House
Women have been getting away with murder since 1973, why not false accusations of rape and/or sexual improprieties?
Doesn’t matter if it’s false. The media grabs it and won’t let go. The radio news briefs on the hour and half hour repeat it over and over. It’s all over TV all evening. The public, being collectively an a$$whole, eats it all up and believes it.
Note to a$$wholes: 5 uncertain statements do not add up to one certain statement. The uncertainties add up. They do not cancel each other out. (Doubt they would understand that.)
The sad thing is that anyone can accuse anyone of anything and suddenly it’s true without any proof.