Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. nuclear general says would resist 'illegal' Trump strike order: CBS
Reuters ^ | 18 Nov 2017

Posted on 11/18/2017 3:07:30 PM PST by mandaladon

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The top U.S. nuclear commander was quoted as saying on Saturday that he would resist President Donald Trump if he ordered an “illegal” launch of nuclear weapons.

CBS News said Air Force General John Hyten, commander of the U.S. Strategic Command (STRATCOM), told an audience at the Halifax International Security Forum in Nova Scotia, Canada that he had given a lot of thought to what he would say if he received such an order.

“I think some people think we’re stupid,” Hyten said in response to a question about such a scenario. “We’re not stupid people. We think about these things a lot. When you have this responsibility, how do you not think about it?”

CBS said Hyten, who is responsible for overseeing the U.S. nuclear arsenal, explained the process that would follow such a command.

“As head of STRATCOM, I provide advice to the president, he will tell me what to do,” he said.

“And if it’s illegal, guess what’s going to happen? I‘m going to say, ‘Mr. President, that’s illegal.’ And guess what he’s going to do? He’s going to say, ‘What would be legal?’ And we’ll come up (with) options, with a mix of capabilities to respond to whatever the situation is, and that’s the way it works. It’s not that complicated.”

Hyten said running through scenarios of how to react in the event of an illegal order was standard practice, and added: “If you execute an unlawful order, you will go to jail. You could go to jail for the rest of your life.”

The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Hyten’s remarks.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: genhyten; hyten; illegalnukeorder; trump; trumpdod; trumpnukeorder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
So the general is the final authority on what constitutes a legal nuclear strike?
1 posted on 11/18/2017 3:07:30 PM PST by mandaladon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Why hasn’t Trump already fired this hack.


2 posted on 11/18/2017 3:09:59 PM PST by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small fee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Fire the general.


3 posted on 11/18/2017 3:10:18 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

This guy may not hold that position much longer with comments like that.


4 posted on 11/18/2017 3:10:30 PM PST by Fungi (A fungus for every life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

The General should have already resigned if that’s what a feels.


5 posted on 11/18/2017 3:12:02 PM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

This was discussed in an earlier thread. Apparently what the general said was not at all controversial, but was twisted into a very misleading headline.


6 posted on 11/18/2017 3:13:10 PM PST by PlateOfShrimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

As if Trump would do an illegal order. Swamper.


7 posted on 11/18/2017 3:13:18 PM PST by amihow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

copied

Hyten explained the process that would follow such a command. As head of STRATCOM, Hyten is responsible for overseeing the U.S. nuclear arsenal.

“I provide advice to the president, he will tell me what to do,” Hyten added. “And if it’s illegal, guess what’s going to happen? I’m going to say, ‘Mr. President, that’s illegal.’ And guess what he’s going to do? He’s going to say, ‘What would be legal?’ And we’ll come up options, with a mix of capabilities to respond to whatever the situation is, and that’s the way it works. It’s not that complicated.”

Hyten said he has been trained every year for decades in the law of armed conflict, which takes into account specific factors to determine legality — necessity, distinction, proportionality, unnecessary suffering and more. Running through scenarios of how to react in the event of an illegal order is standard practice, he said.

“If you execute an unlawful order, you will go to jail. You could go to jail for the rest of your life,” Hyten said.

These series of paragraphs tells us this safeguard has been in position for decades, spanning many Presidents.

But, of course, CBS spins it to “See how out-of-control Trump is???!?


8 posted on 11/18/2017 3:13:26 PM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said theoal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

At least the third time this article has been posted just today ...


9 posted on 11/18/2017 3:14:23 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

This is fake news, generated to try to make Trump look unhinged.

If any government employee is asked the question, “If the President asked you to do something illegal, would you do it?” The answer is obviously, “No.”

This is just sensational because we are talking about nukes.


10 posted on 11/18/2017 3:14:48 PM PST by BusterDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fungi


Not Guilty  (?)
11 posted on 11/18/2017 3:15:02 PM PST by sparklite2 (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

If the order was illegal, then of course he should refuse.

People think Generals—or anyone else in the military —are robots that just blindly do whatever they are told.


12 posted on 11/18/2017 3:16:28 PM PST by Vermont Lt (Burn. It. Down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

All Generals should resist obeying illegal orders.

Trumps orders wouldn’t be illegal and this guy should be imprisoned.


13 posted on 11/18/2017 3:18:17 PM PST by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Soon to be FORMER General!


14 posted on 11/18/2017 3:18:48 PM PST by Brandonmark (Made America Great Again! 11.08.2016 - A DAY OF RENEWAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Why is this jackass out giving speeches about his duties?


15 posted on 11/18/2017 3:20:09 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
Did they ask this guy the same question when obama was prez?

16 posted on 11/18/2017 3:20:20 PM PST by Right Wing Assault (Kill: NFL, Hollywood, NBA, BLM, CAIR, Antifa, SPLC, CNN, ESPN, NPR, TWITTER, FACEBOOK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

We elected president trump. We didn’t elect the general. I’m aware of no such thing as an “illegal” order from our Commander in Chief. If the general knows something I don’t he’d better explain it now. Or else he’s just resigned his commission.


17 posted on 11/18/2017 3:21:00 PM PST by faithhopecharity (“Politicians aren’t born, they’re excreted.” - Marcus Tillius Cicero (3 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

If the General gets an order he’s going to consult with a JAG?
I suppose he thinks he’ll know all the reasons the order is being given so he can figure out if its legal before he follows it. .
This guy needs to be shit canned yesterday.


18 posted on 11/18/2017 3:21:04 PM PST by silverleaf (A man who kneels for the national anthem doesn't stand for much of anything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
I read the general's remarks, and I am not as peeved as most Freepers.

It is the duty of every officer to disobey illegal orders. That is true no matter who is in the White House. The question then becomes, "what is illegal?"

In Military Ethics at West Point, we were taught that an officer should be prepared to resign rather than carry out orders that violate his conscience. If General Hyten doesn't want to obey lawful orders from the POTUS that he finds distasteful, he can resign or face a court martial. All that said, the general seems to have shown a stunning lack of judgment here. I haven't seen the precise text of the question posed (even though I saw his response). But the point of the question appears to be to get the general to undermine the moral authority of the Commander-in-Chief. And by playing into it, he helped the President's domestic enemies (and yes, "enemies" is the right word).

19 posted on 11/18/2017 3:21:40 PM PST by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PlateOfShrimp

Just so. The General explained to the reporter what the laws are. It’s a fairly complicated business. Then CBS, as expected, completely misrepresented what he said. If he made a mistake, it was to talk to the news media at all, and say ANYTHING.


20 posted on 11/18/2017 3:21:59 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson