Skip to comments.
WSJ Editorial Board Calls for Robert Mueller to Step Down After FBI Agent’s Anti-Trump Texts
breitbart ^
| ADAM SHAW
Posted on 12/07/2017 8:25:38 AM PST by davikkm
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: calljack
“We should demand he step down because he ignored sexual harassment reports from agents under his supervision. He created and maintained a hostile work environment. That is the mechanism that is currently the hot topic and has the best chance of working.”
As you noted above, “We need some brave women who were former FBI agents or whatever, who were sexually assaulted under Mulehead or Comedy. Filed complaints and were ignored to step forward.”
21
posted on
12/07/2017 9:14:20 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Build Kate's wall! Keep the illegals and illegal murderers/criminals out of America! MAGA! SLAP!!)
To: calljack
22
posted on
12/07/2017 9:55:35 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
To: davikkm
Mueller and the Justice Department had kept the information from investigators in the House, and refused to allow Strzok to be interviewed.
To: davikkm
24
posted on
12/07/2017 10:26:46 AM PST
by
jazzlite
To: God luvs America
Wray would not respond- it was a thing of beauty!!Wray, another Deep Stater who doesn't think that he works for the president.
And he was a late pick too.
To: Avalon Memories
Congressional (and most government) committees are about as useful as teats on a boar. Their sole purpose seems to be as a signal to donors to direct funds (bribes) toward the right elected jerk. CongressCritter Blowhard is on the Energy Committee and I have energy interests, so I donate to Blowhards campaign.Nunes, Jordan and a few others have been doing good work, working with Trump and exposing the corruption. They are giving Trump reason to fire Mueller, Rosenstein, and a bunch of other Deep Staters.
However, they still have used their power to make arrests for anybody in contempt.
To: FreeReign
Far as I know, Congress does not have arrest powers. They would probably have to refer a case to the Justice Dpt. The people you mentioned are really trying, but Congressional investigations tends to be all but worthless in terms of anything concrete happening.
27
posted on
12/07/2017 1:18:47 PM PST
by
Avalon Memories
(The question about fighting back is not what average people can to do, but how to do we do it?)
To: davikkm
I don't understand why WSJ doesn't call for an end to Special Counsel full stop? The Special Counsel itself has no oversight body and sits outside the tri-parte Constitutional system.
28
posted on
12/07/2017 1:24:13 PM PST
by
The Westerner
(Protect the most vulnerable: get the government out of medicine and education and the forests)
To: The Westerner
The FBI is about to take a hit. Liars and Thieves working for Bronco. WSJ needs to tread lightly.
29
posted on
12/07/2017 1:26:14 PM PST
by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west))
To: Avalon Memories
Far as I know, Congress does not have arrest powers. They would probably have to refer a case to the Justice Dpt. The people you mentioned are really trying, but Congressional investigations tends to be all but worthless in terms of anything concrete happening.The committees have been turning up evidence. For example today's revelation about FBI agent Ohr and the dossier.
About Congress having arrest power for Contempt, see the following...
The right of Congress to compel witness testimony is not listed explicitly in the Constitution but has been recognized since the 1790s, when men accused of attempting to bribe a House member were arrested by the sergeant-at-arms and hauled before the House for trial, according to the Congressional Research Service. Congress, though, has not used its power to arrest and detain witnesses since 1935, instead referring contempt cases to the Justice Department or civil courts.
Link
To: eyedigress
The FBI is about to take a hit. Liars and Thieves working for Bronco. WSJ needs to tread lightly.I don't see a reason why the WSJ should tread lightly. They are correct about Mueller's investigation.
To: FreeReign
Sessions needs to do this fight and keep the WSJ informed of the progress.
I have had enough of media telling me how to think.
32
posted on
12/07/2017 1:54:47 PM PST
by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west))
To: FreeReign
Interesting info about Congressional arrests. Thank you for it. But gathering evidence is pointless unless something is actually done about what we are witnessing.
33
posted on
12/07/2017 1:55:07 PM PST
by
Avalon Memories
(The question about fighting back is not what average people can to do, but how to do we do it?)
To: eyedigress
Sessions needs to do this fight and keep the WSJ informed of the progress. I have had enough of media telling me how to think.When Sessions recuses himself of everything but the kitchen sink, and leaves Deep State Rosenstein in charge, and Obama appointee IG Horowitz performing a small number of investigations, then of course Sessions has a lot of explaining to do.
To: Avalon Memories
Interesting info about Congressional arrests. Thank you for it. But gathering evidence is pointless unless something is actually done about what we are witnessing.If enough evidence is gathered, then they can force a legitimate prosecution. The question is, by who?
To: FreeReign
A serious reflection is required.
Where are we 1 year ago? Where are we now?
36
posted on
12/07/2017 2:03:10 PM PST
by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west))
To: FreeReign
Indeed, the question is by who...and how long will it take them to gather “enough” evidence.
37
posted on
12/07/2017 2:24:18 PM PST
by
Avalon Memories
(The question about fighting back is not what average people can to do, but how to do we do it?)
To: davikkm
The plan was to force Trump to fire Mueller so the Swamp could follow up with the “obstruction of justice” charge they’ve already been throwing out there, and it will be revealing to see just who in the media has been testing the waters on that one. Trump didn’t bite. Things have turned...interesting...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson