I was thinking about this juxtaposition earlier today.
Just one false accuser dragged on the carpet and sued for everything they own will set in motion the repercussion of such actions
“What could be more ironic than the fact that we are experiencing an unprecedented outbreak of long-belated sexual harassment charges in a generation defined by its sexual licentiousness? “
If you'd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
I was just thinking about this today.
Where is the new rule book? Who decides?
It is meaningful that the first accusations against Harvey Weinstein came three days after the death of Hugh Hefner.
To not have dealt with the behavior at the time is just the strategy of cowardice, striking from behind out of a protected nichewith a force far more poisonous than the original affront.
And to accept and approve such bitterness is yet more fertilizer for deviancy.
IMHO.
No one is "safe" in such a community of forced "righteousness."
We jail people yelling fire in crowded places where there is none.
Yet these women walk around free and unscathed. Because woman card.
i believe most criminal trials do no let convictions older than 10 years into evidence-anyone comment?
A culture which throws out God, throws out Good and Evil as Dostoevsky and all Christians know.......and then the godless wonder why there is no morality among the ignorant masses. Wisdom is being able to discern Good and Evil. (Cicero) Now, emotions determine good and evil-—if it “feels” good, it is good-—regardless if it objectifies people or oneself and strips them of dignity and worth.
We have been programming children for decades to “think” Evil is Good, sodomy is a virtue and baby-killing is a “Natural” right from God, no less-—and we wonder why they are so ignorant of Truth (God) and Good and Evil.
We banned it-—and Western Civilization for regression back into the hedonism and pederasty of the ancient pagan/serf/slave days.
Would that this tsunami of yowling accusations, based on nothing in too many cases, results in women putting their clothes back on, for both work and play.
Women of Hollywood strain themselves to find designs that cover less and less and still be called a “dress”, or a “gown”. Several are pasties and a G String with a thin veil suspended from the pasties to the floor and hemmed. That’s a gown.
I remember a book, Sexual McCarthyism written by one Alan Dershowitz, defending what Clinton did.
And, no, Mr. Dershowitz, I have not forgotten.
'Pod
If a man walks into an office with his shirt unbuttoned and that draws the attention of women, the man will be reprimanded.
If a woman walks into an office with her shirt unbuttoned and that draws the attention of men, the men will be reprimanded.
I’ll bet the Chinese must think we really have lost our minds.
The newer laws (since the ‘80s and/or ‘90s) were pushed by feminists and homosexual activists as cover for turning attentions away from adultery, sodomy and the older fault-based divorce laws. They were pushed by lawyers, including politicians, for the obvious pecuniary benefits.
Marijuana and alcohol also distracted and diverted many from paying attention to the changes and motives behind those changes. Indeed, many who have problems with addiction tend to prefer talking about contemporary crime and punishment fads to divert attention from their own obvious problems.
All the while, many have been ignoring the increasing contrast between some of our newer laws and original Law: morality as it was for thousands of years. One case in point would be the new culture of animal worship: preference for animal welfare over human rights.
Really really good work on this one SJ
FIRST CLASS
THIS STUFF DIMINISHES TRUE FEMALE AND HOMOSEXUAL MALE VICTIMS
great job
Happy Chanukah!
Blizzard in TC tonight Mo