In other words, Clinton Foundation funds which were not dedicated to Haiti or otherwise were used to pay for Chelsea’s wedding?
“Personal insult”.
Bill Clinton is a well known rapist who cannot publicly defend himself against the charge because it would open up a slander suit by his accuser.
RAPIST. CLINTON. INSULT AWAY!
This war has been fought with words for too long.
Our enemy hides behind the protection of a fawning media. They hide behind fanciful language and even more fanciful behavior.
People are made to think that the nation of Haiti gave the clintons an ATM card and they went to the machine and withdrew money. That’s not how it happened, and thus everyone who looks at the situation agreed with the WaPo. High levels of finance don’t operate in the lay man’s playing field.
It’s like when people talk about the wealth of Jeff Bezos and the valuation of Amazon taken into account - Or how people think that Elon Musk is super rich. The observer isn’t taught how this level of money works and the illusion is cemented as fact.
When the Clintons “Took money from Haiti” two completely different books were used. Like when Clinton used multiple books during his presidency to hide the US Debt. Clinton didn’t balance a budget at all. Not even close. he just played classical games with the money that not many understand.
When Bush came into office the FIRST budget report that left the west wing showed a major imbalance on the budget - because they didn’t use the same accounting tricks that the Clintons are famous for.
Remember when Hillary’s ‘net value” was released, remember how ticked off she was ? She was ticked off because someone DARED to value her in the same way that a common rich person is valued. The numbers didn’t work out in her favor.
> “No Clinton Foundation funds—dedicated to Haiti or otherwise—were used to pay for Chelsea’s wedding” <
James Woods is right. Wikileaks released an email showing that Bill Clinton lied (again).
Here’s the email (I added a space before each @ to unhotlink the email addresses):
From:doug @presidentclinton.com
To: john.podesta @gmail.com
CC: terry @tdmca.com, cheryl.mills @gmail.com
Date: 2012-01-04 21:45
Subject: Re:
I learned from the best
The investigation into her getting paid for campaigning, using foundation resources for her wedding and life for a decade, taxes on money from her parents....
I hope that you will speak to her and end this
Once we go down this road...
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/52046
I was in Haiti in 1978; I never saw such poverty and I was in Vietnam 8 years prior.
If Slick claims his reputation has been damaged, have everyone who believes they looted Haiti and repeated the statement pay damages.
QB VII judgment: One (1) cent X the number of people who republished the statement could amount to several hundred dollars. That’s a pretty good time in Vegas for the Bent One.
Balls & a great actor. Someone put him in a movie!
Balls & a great actor. Someone put him in a movie!
I believe I read (back then) that Chelsea’s wedding was over a million and approaching $2 million in cost. I wonder if Bill/Hill could show where the money did originate??
Oh, please!
The last thing that anyone could call me is a fan of either of the clintons, or their daughter, for that matter. However, they are not stupid. The simplest way to have the foundation pay for Chelsea’s wedding, without actually having a paper trail showing that, is to make a large disbursement that is classified as salary to Bill. The disbursement is not only large enough to pay for the wedding, but also the taxes that Bill will pay on that disbursement. He comes out smelling like a rose, because he was accused of wrongdoing, and legally speaking did nothing wrong. In fact, he paid tax at a rate of 39.5%, so he’s contributing to reducing the deficit.
I firmly believe that the foundation paid for just about everything in their lives, because Bill and Chelsea earned lots of money from the foundation. I would not be surprised to find out that the foundation rented offices from properties owned or controlled by the clintons, and similar such subterfuges that look perfectly legal on the surface, but are all part of a pattern of the Clintons looting their foundation.
However, no one should look for a check from the Clinton Foundation to some catering hall, because you will never find it. It simply does not exist, because they are not that stupid. Evil, yes. But not stupid.
Prove it.