Posted on 02/01/2018 1:03:38 PM PST by Kaslin
Trump’s State of the Union address on Tuesday was met with widespread approval from most of the country, but many Democrats, liberals, progressives, and other longtime opponents of the president were unmoved by the speech. One exception to this general trend in the media sphere was Republican pollster Frank Luntz, who tweeted his approval of many different aspects of Trump’s speech before concluding:
Tonight, I owe Donald Trump an apology. Tonight, I was moved and inspired. Tonight, I have hope and faith in America again.
It may go away tomorrow…
But tonight, America is great again. #SOTU— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) January 31, 2018
For anyone who was following Luntz’s live tweet-by-tweet response to the State of the Union, his apology would not have come as a shock. As he reacted to the president's words in real time, Luntz seemed especially pleased by the way that Trump laid out a mix of statistical data and personal stories that reinforced his message on each key issue, but the GOP pollster was equally annoyed at Democrats for their sour mood throughout the speech:
Why are @TheDemocrats not applauding job growth, higher wages and the drop in Latino and African-American unemployment?
I thought economic success is good for everyone regardless of party. #SOTU— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) January 31, 2018
Trump's language on tax reform is right-on. #SOTU
Focusing on people earning $55,000-$75,000 is smart. And he's being specific – $4,000 per family IS a lot of money.— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) January 31, 2018
Anecdotal tax-cut stories are less impactful than actual numbers.
The GOP needed to emphasize the actual tax-cut numbers… And Trump did that tonight. #SOTU— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) January 31, 2018
The structure of tonight's #SOTU speech is well done: Started with taxes, moved to opportunity, and then to military.
Many people watch only the first 15 minutes – they will like what they heard tonight.— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) January 31, 2018
If Roger Goodell wasn't listening before now, he is listening now.
Trump doesn't give in and he doesn't give up. #SOTU— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) January 31, 2018
This speech is going to have a measurable impact on Trump's favorability and popularity. He's saying exactly what people want to hear.
Whoever told @TheDemocrats to sit on their hands made a huge mistake. #SOTU pic.twitter.com/6vYeFJOyMp— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) January 31, 2018
I have criticized the President's language a lot in recent months.
But tonight is Donald Trump at his very best. He's personalized his language and policies better than I've ever seen. #SOTU— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) January 31, 2018
Srsly, @TheDemocrats look like they smelled a fart.#SOTU— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) January 31, 2018
This speech represents the presidential performance that Trump observers have been waiting for – brilliant mix of numbers and stories, humility and aggressiveness, traditional conservatism and political populism.
Only one word qualifies: Wow. #SOTU— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) January 31, 2018
Even in foreign policy and national security, this speech a perfect blend of strength and empathy. These heroic stories break our hearts, but sturdy our resolve.
This is the Trump his voters wanted him to be. #SOTU— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) January 31, 2018
Luntz was no mere keyboard warrior, however. On Wednesday morning, he walked straight into the lion's den at MSNBC to rhetorically spar with Trump's arch-foes Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski. As Luntz reiterated many of the same points that he had already made on Twitter, Scarborough and Brzezinski forcefully and indignantly resisted the notion that anyone could have approved of Trump's message. Luntz summed up his frustration with the Morning Joe panelists (and hyper-partisan liberals in general) when he asked early on in the segment: "Why is it that everything he says drives the Left nuts?" Instead of offering a measured response to Luntz's question, the MSNBC pundits carried on by repeatedly characterizing Trump as a threat to America and a "racist" who is "dividing, disrupting, and destroying institutions of government" that protect the country. Mika even referred to Trump as a "great dictator" (a statement that perfectly corresponds with months of her show's coverage), language that Luntz immediately called out as being innappropriate.
For those who doubt that Luntz has been very critical of Trump over the past couple of years, it's worth looking back at some of the highlights of his displeasure with the President.
Back in 2015, at the start of the Republican primary season, Trump got into a very personal kerfuffle with Luntz after one of the pollster's famed focus groups lit up the then-candidate with some pretty harsh criticism after the first Fox News debate, including describing Trump as "mean," "angry," unpresidential, and a potential mole trying to destroy the Republican Party from within. The Washington Times reported on the Trump-Luntz fallout that resulted:
“I watch this guy do a really negative report on me,” Trump said then, Business Insider reported. “And the only reason he did it, in my opinion, is because I didn’t want to hire him commercially. I think it’s disgusting.”
Luntz responded with a denial — and then this: “[Trump] launches an attack on everyone who is even remotely critical.”
Politico in that same month ran a story with this headline: “Fox’s Luntz Blasted Trump at Koch Seminar.”
And it opened this way: “Donald Trump’s feud with GOP pollster Frank Luntz escalated Monday — with Trump calling on Fox News to fire Luntz from overseeing its post-debate focus groups, and Luntz launching a profanity-laden tirade to describe the real estate showman turned renegade presidential candidate. In an interview with POLITICO, Luntz said Trump … [was] ‘delivering a big f— you’ to the elites in America. … ‘But f— you doesn’t solve anything. F— you doesn’t make life any better. F— you makes you feel good, but it doesn’t get you where you need to go.’”
As the electoral season rolled onwards in 2016, Luntz continued to criticize Trump as a major cause for the national climate of "incivility":
Luntz credits Trump’s vulgar style with 2016 being the “worst year for incivility since they started measuring it several years ago,” citing parents having to explain many of Trump’s statements, such as one reference during a debate to the size of his private parts, to their young children. “Mitt Romney didn’t talk like this,” Luntz said. “He didn’t win either!” an audience member responded.
After Trump was successfully elected President, Luntz did not let up in going after Trump. One of the most important episodes in this respect was Trump's response to the violence in Charlottesville, VA last summer, which Luntz saw a major gaffe. At the time, Luntz was quite vocal about his opposition to Trump's characterization of the violence there as a two-sided affair:
“Many sides” did not suffer deaths in #Charlottesville today. https://t.co/HwobLDnips— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) 12 August 2017
Would be nice if someone in a senior White House and/or Executive Branch position could come and publicly clear this up. #Charlottesville pic.twitter.com/lanHigGKNA— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) 13 August 2017
More than a week after the initial violence, Luntz suggested in a tweet that Trump hated the news media more than Neo-Nazis and jihadi terrorists:
Trump doesnt just criticize media more than he criticizes neo-Nazis – he criticizes them more than radical Islamic terrorists. #PhoenixRally— Frank Luntz (@FrankLuntz) 23 August 2017
Almost a year after Trump's election, Luntz was expressing sentiments similar to those of the Morning Joe journos that he was in such strong disagreement with just yesterday, as is demonstrated by some comments that Luntz provided to U.S. News & World Report last November:
Adds Republican strategist and veteran pollster Frank Luntz: "We can't talk to each other anymore. I can't conduct a focus group without people attacking each other. The cameras give them a license to be loud and obnoxious." Noting that Americans find less and less common ground, Luntz adds: "We are looking for a reason to be outraged. We have become the aggrieved society."
"The president sets a mood," Luntz said. "The president sets a tone....And each day the country becomes more divided, more polarized, more intolerant."
Luntz certainly has come a long way from this stance that he held just a few months ago, but don't expect the rest of Trump's critics to follow his lead. For the most part, it seems they're in the #Resistance for good.
It’s okay ..relax..cause no one takes what you do seriously anyhow.
Is Luntz the one on Fox who displays those annoying charts and data graphs at the bottom of the screen? He’s like a Karl Rove wannabe.
“It may go away tomorrow”
—
You can go away today, you fat dolt.
Frank(ly),
My dear, I don’t give a damn!
People should be allowed to change their minds. Sounds genuine to me.
I agree.
I actually dont know who this clown is..
Trying to get back in good graces. Offers to analyze must be drying up.
Let’s be fair. When somebody does something right, they should be supported not trashed. That doesn’t mean we have to like him, but let’s give him credit for this statement.
So, that’s Luntz, Prager.....anyone know where Shapiro stands?
I agree.
Yes good grief give the guy a break and welcome him aboard. Remember Breitbart was a hardcore democrat leftist before he came out of the fog.
I am in a mood to throw eggs at Luntz, so here goes one egg:
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/12/the-worst-political-predictions-of-2016-214555
Yes Shapiro has warmed to Trump.
I used to like Ben, but when he started spouting the anti-Trump stuff, I never listened to him again. Glad he’s warmed, but has he apologized and admitted he was wrong. I admired Dennis Prager for his statement.
Agreed. I change the channel anytime that fat little goblin comes on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.