“She will win mega bucks from the school if school did that. Wacky laws we have.”
Nope. She signed an airtight contract. The contract has expired. She’s done. They can even use force to carry her out of the building. She is trespassing. They don’t have to “evict” her in some formal process. It’s a college dorm, not a rental open to the public covered by typical occupancy laws.
You are not considering how a leftist judge will twist this situation. He could easily rule that the issue is not one of contract law, but one of property law. And regardless of the language in any contract, the student acquired tenancy rights upon occupancy and so locking her out without court approval violated her rights.
Leftist judges do things backwards. They write their desired conclusion and order first. Then try to come up with some reasonable sounding yet completely dishonest reasoning to justify it later.