Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Levin: Trump's tariffs are an unpatriotic tax on all Americans
American Thinker ^ | 03/02/2018 | Ed Straker

Posted on 03/02/2018 7:28:44 AM PST by SeekAndFind

President Trump is raising tariffs 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum, claiming that cheap steel from other countries has hurt the American steel industry.  His claim, that steel imported at lower prices hurts our steel industry, is certainly true.

But talk show host Mark Levin says Trump's tariffs are crony capitalist gifts for wealthy steel-owners that are bad for the economy as a whole.  On his talk show last night, he listed a number of reasons why:

1. Industries that depend heavily on steel, such as auto and airplane manufacturers, will take a big hit.  With the increase in the price of steel, they will have to increase the price of cars and planes, reducing sales and profits, and ultimately, these manufacturers will have to fire employees to compensate for the inevitable losses.

2. Industries that even peripherally rely on steel will be affected as well.  Just think of any business that needs anything made of steel, whether it be cars, refrigerators, trucks, stoves, computers, or any number of other things.  They will all have to raise prices to compensate.

3. The ultimate end purchasers of anything made of steel, or anything made with steel, will have to pay higher prices.  Levin frames this as a loss of liberty, which is correct, and, equally important, as a tax that punishes the American people.  Every time you pay more for a car or a boat or a can of beans or even a loaf of bread, which is made in an oven, which, guess what, is made of metal, you will have to pay more.  Because metal is so ubiquitous in manufacturing, Trump's tax will make you pay higher prices for nearly everything you buy.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hysteric; levin; marklevin; nervousnelly; nevertrumper; talkradio; tariffs; tax; trump; whiner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last
To: SeekAndFind
The real issue its how do you compete with countries that don't play fair? We have ignored this issue for years. Countries like China have state run subsidized businesses that undercut outside competition to capture a market. How do the naysayers propose to level the playing field or do they suggest we just work harder to prop up the rest of the world with negative trade deficits? Just like the Middle East when they had control of oil, they set the world crude price. If these countries can destroy the completion, the cartel then dictates the market price. The question is, in the overall world market place, who needs who the most? The more self-sufficient you become, the less you need to rely on outside price manipulators. We established that with oil. There is no leverage in being dependent on outside sources. It seems like common sense to me, but globalists want to foster a one world community on the backs of Americans.
41 posted on 03/02/2018 8:05:28 AM PST by iontheball (lLL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I have no problem paying a little more for things if it aligns with bringing back jobs. The continued demand for jobs will raise wages, especially for those with low incomes. Not everyone can be a doctor, lawyer, or engineer etc...

It’s also a national security issue.


42 posted on 03/02/2018 8:06:00 AM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

“What Levin says doesn’t always pan out.”

It will be fun observing him eat his words in 5 years...if he’s still around then.

Which is unlikely.


43 posted on 03/02/2018 8:06:24 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Freedom56v2

Trumps tax cuts ad regulation reform will more than offset pressure to raise prices on consumers.

‘You state this as fact, please provide source.’

The article posted was an opinion piece, not facts. My opinion is that taken as a whole (corporate tax cuts, less regulation, some tariffs etc ) will be a wash at worse on prices.


44 posted on 03/02/2018 8:06:44 AM PST by RonnG ( v)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Americans can handle it.

Fighting back against the Chinese takeover of American industries through their massive $0.25-a-day convict sweatshops is going to hurt. There will be casualties. This is a war.

Some ‘crony’ Americans will get rich but other Americans will see and experience opportunity. The goal is to create more opportunity and to bring back the industrial base.


45 posted on 03/02/2018 8:10:57 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Google Reagan and Harley-Davidson


46 posted on 03/02/2018 8:11:23 AM PST by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I love Levin, but he's blowing this way out of proportion. And if he's really worried about patriotism, then I'd love to hear his take on how patriotic it is to strike trade deals that leave the U.S. with massive deficits and then allow other countries to dump huge quantities of products and/or raw materials -- that we produce here in America -- on our shores. That certainly lowers prices, but does it not also cost jobs and sometimes put American companies out of business, Mr. Levin? So I guess the question is, is it better to pay an extra $0.10 for a loaf of bread, or to be driven out of entire industries and lose many thousands of jobs, all to protect foreign jobs?

In any case, I'm looking forward to Levin's hour-long chat with Nunes this coming Sunday evening. Should be a great show.
47 posted on 03/02/2018 8:11:40 AM PST by LIConFem (I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot accept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In this Trump is correct. It is more of a national security issue in case of war. What the globalist have done is take the United States infrastructure and technology needed for wars out of the US or put them in globalist hands in the US(Just look at our space program and really think that through). We were betrayed from within our own country by our leaders. Our manufacturing is in Asia now, it is not even on this continent. China or Russia declare war tomorrow and it is long and drawn out, we are in a world of hurt.


48 posted on 03/02/2018 8:12:04 AM PST by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
" When I think that Hillary came close to being president but Trump stopped her, I don’t care what Trump does. He’ll always have my support."

Thank you for saying this and reminding me how blessed we are to have President Trump.

49 posted on 03/02/2018 8:12:30 AM PST by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Levin is becoming more and more out of touch. Been happening since the campaign season of 2016.


50 posted on 03/02/2018 8:12:56 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Mr Levine is stepping into his area of incompetence, IMO.

Based on perfomance to date I’ll continue to trust President Trump & ignore Mark Levine.


51 posted on 03/02/2018 8:13:36 AM PST by TheStickman (#MAGA all day every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101
Taxing raw materials is a horrible idea. It places every manufacturing operation at a disadvantage in the US. How could a businessman get this so wrong?

Tax finished goods to benefit US business. Finished goods are where the bulk of the trade deficit lies.

52 posted on 03/02/2018 8:14:58 AM PST by caltaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: All

53 posted on 03/02/2018 8:16:31 AM PST by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sell-out loser Levin... who asked this Never Trumper for his opinion? Get lost!


54 posted on 03/02/2018 8:17:00 AM PST by Reno89519 (Americans Are Dreamers, Too! No to Amnesty, Yes to Catch-and-Deport, and Yes to E-Verify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Levin of all people pulling the patriotism card over foreign steel?

“Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel.” - Samuel Johnson


55 posted on 03/02/2018 8:18:26 AM PST by proust ("The rule is, jam tomorrow and jam yesterday, but never jam today.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

As recent as 1995 the US was the #1 economy in the world. Now China holds that spot primarily from trading with us! While our companies left our shores we were making them rich. Every member of the Chinese Parliament is a billionaire.

I use as an example Nike shoes. They have a plant in China that employs 25,000 people! Imagine if tat plant was in the US? We might pay a little more for Nike shoes but 25k inner city welfare recipients would be working..


56 posted on 03/02/2018 8:21:14 AM PST by lone star annie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

From Wiki:

The tariff history of the United States spans from colonial times to present. The first tariff law passed by the U.S. Congress, acting under the then recently ratified Constitution, was the Tariff of 1789. Its purpose was to generate revenue for the federal government (to run the government and to pay the interest on its debt), and also to act as a protective barrier around domestic industries.[1] An Import tax was collected by treasury agents before goods could be landed at U.S. ports.

Tariffs have historically served a key role in the nation’s foreign trade policy. They were the greatest (approaching 95% at times) source of federal revenue until the Federal income tax began after 1913. For well over a century the federal government was largely financed by tariffs averaging about 20% on foreign imports. There are no tariffs for imports or shipments from one state to another. Since the 1940s, foreign trade policies have focused more on reciprocal tariffs and low tariff rates rather than using tariffs as a significant source of Federal tax revenue.

Tariffs were the main source of revenue for the federal government from 1789 to 1914. During this period, there was vigorous debate between the various political parties over the setting of tariff rates. In general Democrats favored a tariff that would pay the cost of government, but no higher. Whigs and Republicans favored higher tariffs to protect and encourage American industry and industrial workers. Since the early 20th century, however, U.S. tariffs have been very low and have been much less a matter of partisan debate.

Prior to the American Civil War tariffs were generally low, but rose during its duration. At the end of the end of the war in 1865 about 63% of federal revenue was generated by excise taxes, which exceeded the 25.4% generated by tariffs. In 1915 during World War I tariffs generated 30.1% of revenues. Since 1935 tariff income has continued to be a declining percentage of Federal revenues.


I find the second line in the second paragraph rather interesting.


57 posted on 03/02/2018 8:21:22 AM PST by nesnah (Liberals - the petulant children of politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Other countries have done this to America for decades, their governments subsidize industries and put American manufacturers out of business. Not a level playing field, and our stupid ass “leaders” let it happen


58 posted on 03/02/2018 8:22:11 AM PST by PMAS (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All
Just one city in China makes 90% of the world’s electronics ,proof:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/11/inside-shenzhen-china-s-gadget-capital/
China destroyed the U.S. electronics industry .And China is now trying to destroy the U.S. steel and aluminum industries.

Go Trump!

A country needs an electronics industry in order to survive

The USA didn't import hardly anything from any foreign country all the way up to 1960. CNN and the media want you to think we need to “trade” with China.

59 posted on 03/02/2018 8:25:10 AM PST by rurgan (The Federal reserve r leftists raising rates to hurt Trump.Fed kept rates at 0 for all of obama yrs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My problem isn’t with imported steel, per-se, it is with the quality control standards of imported steel. “316 Stainless Steel” from China that begins showing surface corrosion after 6-months is not acceptable. It has all the right certifications and everything, but it is junk. But then sometimes it is fine.

More importantly, though, if they can’t reliably and consistently manufacture “Stainless Steel” that will resist corrosion for more than 6-months, how can I trust that their structural/strength specs are accurate and honest?

I have some stainless steel items that were made in the US with US-produced steel during the 1970s, 80s and early 90s and none of it is showing the corrosion-levels that I see on some of the stuff I have that was made in China just a couple of years ago.


60 posted on 03/02/2018 8:25:43 AM PST by WayneS (An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson