Posted on 03/04/2018 4:40:26 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
March 4th, 2018
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): White House trade adviser Peter Navarro; Business Roundtable President Joshua Bolten.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross; Sen. Anus King, I-Maine.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Navarro; Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Joe Manchin, D-W.Va.; Andrew Pollack, father of student killed in Florida school shooting.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Ross; Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn.; former White House chief of staff Reince Priebus.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Navarro; Manchin; Gov. John Kasich, R-Ohio.
When you say “black crime” you really mean “minority crime (includes Hispanics)”. This allowed Cruz through his Hispanic-like surname cover to go “unreported (39+ opportunities)”. Cruz was a “paper\statistical” minority not an ethnically one. If his name was O’Brien I bet one incident would have been enough to report him.
I will disagree with out on Marxists are not logical
Marxists are clearly logical. They desire to be King/Dictator of their domain - that domain being the World. Start Locally expand Globally. Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Xi, Hillary, Nobama to name just a few
It's up to you to make the stew... and when you do.. Give my compliments to the Chef!
The Trump DOJ transition team was a who’s-who of major players from big DC law firms. The main proponent of RR seems to Ron Tenpas, who was a close associate of Chris Christie. (FBI Director Wray is also a close associate of Chris Christie).
But, despite frequent claims on FR, there was no reason to believe RR would be as biased as he seems to be. RR is one of very few who has put crooked Democrats in jail.
Putting the question in the context of the regulation ...
(1)Political relationship means a close identification with an elected official, a candidate (whether or not successful) for elective, public office, a political party, or a campaign organization, arising from service as a principal adviser thereto or a principal official thereof;
In shorthand, your argument is that it is a gray area whether or not Jeff Sessions had a political relationship with the Trump campaign. I take it your conclusion is that Jeff Sessions did NOT have a political relationship with the Trump campaign.
I don't think the recusal is a close question. Sessions' impartiality with respect to the Trump campaign can reasonably be questioned.
Dumbass F Chuck thinks Tx will vote Beto over Cruz LOL
Hey F Chuck, This is a Primary run off Between Republicans.
Lupe Valdez will NEVER beat Greg Abbott
Nice list.
Also the infamous Barry O quote... I will have a lot more flexibility after the election. Tie in anything related to uranium if applicable and I think not only the Clinton foundation had their “ beak wetted “but also some offshore account under Barry & Michelle’s names.... How else does a guy with a senators or Presidents salary afford the real estate he now owns.
We know but the MSM will never ask that question...
Hint. Most don’t realize that campaign contributions to candidates live on for their use after office as long as they can tie in some part of their residence work to public good....
I wish I knew who, or what, RR is.
See the post the comment was addressed to.
Rod Rosenstein = RR
Sessions was reported to be one of the most respected Senators. We know he's a gentleman's gentleman.
His flaw, imho, that while the friendly confines of Alabama suit Sessions demeanor very well, the hard ball politics of destruction in DC do not. Queensbury rules don't apply anylonger. I'm not convinced his senatorial duties as applied in DC suited him that well, either, which is why he had no problem leaving a comfy Senate seat.
That's the reason, despite my defense, I believe a stronger AG would help this administration.
I noticed TWO interesting dynamics today on Chris' show.
1. Figures lie and liers figure. Chris quickly interpolated Steel Cost/Per car as an aggregate cost to the country to make the $$$$ look huge. A classic method of lying and one that works on the 80%.
2. Much more interesting was the closing segment on the panel. Even the detestable Gerald Seib is starting to badmouth the Mueller investigation. He and Harmen were couching it as time to worry about the sanctity of the electoral process.
3. Democrats can no longer cheat at the ballot box as before so we need to have greater "control" - I call B.S. but I can see where the Dems would be in a panic. Shine the Light
Well stated.
PC driven by quest for federal monies lead to a “stand down “approach resulting in unnecessary deaths.
MSM not touching the question of who will be sued and when. Appears to me that there is a basis for that to occur to bring the negligence aspect to it’s appropriate light.
How is it, mylife....that all your posts have the “To:” top line ommitted ?
I think your analysis is on point and quite possibly an accurate summary.
But Rosenstein being voted in by most of the Democrats is not a good thing I’d argue back.
Do you really think 94 senators would have voted affirmative for, say, Rudy Guiliani?
But you could be right. Sessions had some notion that he would be the one to set the FBI and DOJ straight but he is entirely too civil to be nasty when nasty is needed.
I hope you’re right.
Just keep my scenario in the back of your mind.
Tom Brokaw says we need to say whats good enough for you legislatively, You don’t need an AR 15 to do what a shotgun will do.
OK jackass, trade in your Mercedes for a trabant, give up your ribeye for a potato, heck a turds a turd right Tom?
What a jackwagon, Look I’m a gun guy...
Really? Spare me Tom
Day 20 on the “take their guns” BS
20 solid days
Who’s under attack?
I assume you saw the article (Might have been Rush) discussing how China imports Steel to the U.S. through Mexico. With Canada and Mexico dragging their feet on renegotiation MAFTA, Trump did two things, issue the Trade tariff "bomb" and announce his 2020 re-election campaign .
The MAGA train is not stopping - waiting Trump out may prove dis-advantageous to the rest of the world.
Italy elections today - results may prove interesting
18 days
If you'll forgive me, a slight addition:
I saw that interview and I wanted to punch that has-been nothing-burger through the screen.
This is the best they can do? Tom Brokaw?
A zero and right....he’s a gun guy.
Right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.