At least someone bothered to look.
It was probably easy to verify if anyone bothered.
IF we were wrong, we blew up a lot of Syrian chemical weapons on mis-information.
Hmmm, is there a downside to this?
This comment, about this news organization is very accurate. They really do attempt to bring the news without bias. I would be very doubtful if CNN or BBC made this claim, but these people have the traditional view of the call of JOURNALISM.
Who allowed this reporter in country and who lined up the people to be interviewed?
They were calling Roger Stone an agent of the Kremlin on another thread - for real. Not kidding.
I myself (i.e. ME AAABEST) was accused of being a Russian agent... the guy was not kidding. Pretty sure he was lucid. He actually put a "tag" on me. After it was shown impossible to him (the douche) and he'd be laughed off the forum, he called me an "anti-American."
The latest story is that the Russians and Syrians will not let the inspectors on the site where the attack occurred.
There’s an easy way to settle this debate.
Just ask Trump to release the evidence that supports his decision to bomb Syria.
While were at it, I would also like to hear a logical explanation as to why Assad has repeatedly risked using chemical weapons even though such weapons have had absolutely no strategic impact on the war.
I don’t expect this to be heard in the Western media.
Nor do I expect an embarrassed apology from Trump for being fooled by ‘The Deep State’. Unless he wants to use this incident to hammer ‘The Deep State’ out of the swamp.
"...Syria..."
Why are there stories that the OPCW inspectors are not being let in?
Russia denies it, maybe the Assad government let this guy in the way, they’ve let people like Tulsi Gabbards tour Syria, controlled.
2. We drew a line in the sand, and enforced it, making global tyrants pause a little more.
I fail to see the downside here. Let the Syrian tyrant's forces and the Jihadists keep killing each other, while we keep putting the other authoritarians on notice that we are more than ready to act when necessary.
You really think there is open communication by any citizen to a Western Reporter in Assad’s regime? You really thing they are going to tell a reporter anything but what the Regime tells them to say?
You do realize chemical weapons have a limtied life span. There would be NO evidence now of a chem weapon attack
Your nativity on how the goverments in the middle east, and chemical weapons work, is just about total.
I like OAN. They are “Pro American” and pretty “dull” with the delivery of news. It’s an old fashion facts and data operation, for the most part. It reminds me of the old days of cable news.
I like to just leave it on while I’m doing other stuff. OAN would be perfect for Airports and Waiting rooms.
In this part of the world you do as thugs with guns tell you to or else your children end up in rape rooms and you get fed feet 1st into a tree limb grinder.
The “reporter’s” local Government assigned handlers make sure they only talk to the right sources. The idea that there is any “journalism” coming out of this part of the world is absurd.
This is from last year, but YES Obama and McCain’s Jihadists were caught this time last year running a False Flag. It was the 3rd time the Jihadists have been caught doing this.
So it happens again like clock work as soon as President Trump says we are pulling U.S. troops out of Syria. Immediately the usual warmongers accuse Assad of doing it. There is debate about who did it and if there really was a chemical attack or something else. Coincidence??? I don’t think so.
Within 24 hours Israel attacks without properly investing this. Many people accuse Israel of trying to cover up what happened. The U.N. decides to have an investigative team come this week to determine if this really happened. Too late we attack Syria even though the Secretary of Defense said we had no information confirming it.
What’s funny is that we hit these buildings where the Sarin gas is at, and no one dies nearby within 5 miles. You can’t hit them and think nothing is going to happen. How much money did the U.S. tax payers pay on those missiles vs. the cost of building the building in Syria. I believe we blew up a few million dollar buildings that cost us about $180 million. This is reminiscent of President Reagan blowing up Muammar Gaddafi tents in the desert with million dollar missiles and bombs.
Seems like Soros and the Deep State are in full control after President Trump’s lawyer office was raided. Hillary is going to get that war in Syria and with Russia we all did not want. You have people like Pocahontas Elizabeth Warren praising President Trump.
Even if the chemical attack was not a False Flag, which I believe it is, then we still have no business over there. It’s not our fight. If Israel wants to fight Syria, then let them do it.
Gen. Mattis in recent days stated the evidence was strong enough to warrant the strikes. I trust his word above anyone’s, including an OAN reporter fed info by Syrians.
ia this report a year old the date says 4/16/2017.
Kremlin agents or not... There needs to be some trust in government and if Trump is convinced that they used chemical armaments, that’s good enough for me. At least he is doing something... Syria and the Russian’s crossed Obama’s ‘line in the sand’ and they laughed because of his ineptness. They will not do he same when Trump draws a line.
No doubt the intelligence resources of OAN totally surpass the combined intelligence resources of the UK, France and the US ...