Posted on 05/10/2018 4:18:22 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
What if the reason why the FBI wants to keep their mole a secret is because the mole is still working for Trump? <<
What’s Jeff Sessions doing nowadays?
The more I think about it, the more I’m convinced that the spy the FBI planted in the Trump Campaign was Jeff Sessions. That would explain his total inertia against ANY indictments; his assinine gushing about the great honor and purity of Rosenweasel and Mueller, et al, etc., etc.
MLK did in fact have communists connections and J Edgar Hoover had the FBI surveilling lots of people.
But the FBI being weaponized by the Obama administration to spy on a competing campaign is entirely different.
And in the historical context, it was the MSM that was pushing the race issue so hard. The Kennedy brothers were afraid of a civil war being inflamed by the MSM, not the next election.
Me Too!!...if the FBI with all their resources ACTUALLY believed tha, they are worse then the Keystone Cops..it was an attempted “soft clandestine coup”....pure and simple
The mole is already known to anyone who is interested.
To obtain the FISA wattent the FBI said the was a foreign agent in the Trump campaign. That person was in fact an undercover FBI agent used in another sting involing a Russian mobster. It’s the man they first listened to
The mole is already known to anyone who is interested.
To obtain the FISA wattent the FBI said the was a foreign agent in the Trump campaign. That person was in fact an undercover FBI agent used in another sting involing a Russian mobster. It’s the man they first listened to
Its simple math, the ‘Plant informant’ was used in the FISA Court, only one name was bought before the Judges ‘Carter Page’. The FBI sent Carter Page to Russia to build his ‘Spy Credentials’ then sent him into the Trump campaign, which allowed the FBI to use every available means to Survaville everyone in Trump’s campaign Phones & E-mails. The FBI boldly lied to FISA Court Judge’s faces. This makes Watergate look like a pimple on an elephants ass.
Yes his name is Carter Page
In 2013 Carter Page was working as an “under-cover employee” (UCE) of the FBI, helping them to build a case against “Evgeny Buryakov”. In March 2016 Carter Page remained their informant pre-trial leading to a pleading of guilty from Buryakov.
Your scenario might explain why DiGenova couldn't join Trump's legal team due to their unspecified conflicts of interest.
“I believe Joe DiGenova and Victoria Toensing are the legal counsel for Carter Page.”
If true, they’ve been had, or something really stinks.
I love it when a plan comes together. The insurance policy was taken out by certain FBI agents on orders from above.
CP was already an FBI asset going back in time. Had some Russian contacts and was a perfect plant to an unknowing fledgling Trump campaign that really had no seasoned political advisors. The hiring of Manafort as campaign chairman is now suspicious as well.
This story is going to unravel as House and Senate investigators press into this. The American public will be shocked at what’s happened here. Already more than 50 percent believe this is a political prosecution.
Toensing represents an inside operation on the Uranium one scandal...
Toensing represents an inside operator and informant on the Uranium one scandal...
1. The public stories you see about this battle between the House Intelligence Committee and the DOJ is nothing more than a charade designed to bring public attention to an issue, person, or point of fact that is allegedly in dispute between the two.
2. Every news report about this "battle" includes some pretty detailed information about what exactly a given House subpoena to the DOJ is requesting. The most recent reports about this "FBI asset" the House is seeking to identify in the redacted document from Rosenstein to Mueller outlining the responsibilities of the special counsel in investigating "Russian collusion" in the 2016 election.
3. What better way to guarantee major media coverage than to fabricate a pitched battle between the House committee and the DOJ that even includes threats of impeachment of top DOJ officials?
4. The House committee doesn't really have any interest in getting their hands on this information. What they're really doing is making a big deal out of this "dispute" with the DOJ, for the purpose of getting a pretty detailed description of the information in these redacted documents out in the public eye.
5. The House committee doesn't really have any interest in making the public aware of this information. What they really want to do is telegraph its existence to specific people who: (A) have a great interest in the redacted information, and (B) have a lot of legal leverage to get their hands on it.
5. Who might these "specific people" be? We may have seen a perfect example of them last week in the court proceedings in the Eastern Virginia and D.C. District Courts: The lawyers representing the defendants in the various criminal cases Mueller's team is prosecuting. Can it possibly be a mere coincidence that the redacted document mentioned above in Item #2 is one of the specific documents listed in the discovery demands by the lawyers for the Russian company that is among the defendants in Mueller's election interference case?
Ah — OK. I stand corrected on that!
None Dare Call It Treason
Agree ~ Gowdy is one of “ them “
Woolsey.....
I have thought that the FBI had someone on the inside for a long time now.
The Insurance Policy, The “EC”, The 2016 FBI Counterintel Operation, and The Mysterious Informant Who Originated Brennan’s EC…
Posted on May 11, 2018 by sundance
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.