Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Immigrant children and the “Attractive Nuisance Doctrine”
Original content ^ | 06/20/2018 | JDsteel

Posted on 06/20/2018 6:06:31 AM PDT by jdsteel

The attractive nuisance doctrine states that a landowner may be held liable for injuries to children trespassing on the land if the injury is caused by an object on the land that is likely to attract children. The doctrine is designed to protect children who are unable to appreciate the risk posed by the object.

For instance, if you have a pool or trampoline in your backyard and a neighborhood child sneaks in to play and is hurt or killed YOU will be found guilty...even if you are the neighborhood grouch that chases kids away from your lawn.

The way to protect yourself AND the children is to create a barrier.

The USA is an attractive nuisance to immigrants.

The way to protect us AS WELL AS IMMIGRANT CHILDREN is to create a WORKING barrier. In other words, to build a wall.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chat; immigrant; vanity
We are guilty if we do not build a wall.
1 posted on 06/20/2018 6:06:31 AM PDT by jdsteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jdsteel

The USA is a “nuisance”? Liberals all over the world agree with that.


2 posted on 06/20/2018 7:00:37 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

If the liberals themselves were only a nuisance, that would be OK. But they have become a Clear and Present Danger.

Liberals...can’t live with ‘em, can’t kill ‘em (YET).


3 posted on 06/20/2018 7:23:23 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jdsteel

Trespassing is why backhoe’s were invented.


4 posted on 06/20/2018 8:16:23 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

Trespassing is why backhoe’s were invented.””’

I agree.

Horses get the same legaleze applied to them. I have No Trespassing signs at every gate. My dog has a sharp eye, and I have had to run off people who were legally walking on the county road, but who had a dog that was NOT on a leash. Told one woman who looked like a 70 y/o hippie in tie-dyed clothes that IF I saw her dog loose again, I would shoot it before she could call it back to her. She laughed. I told her she certainly did NOT understand the laws about livestock & loose dogs, and she could go to the local animal control to verify my words.

We are getting more & more ‘city slickers’ into this valley & they think they can let their dogs roam.


5 posted on 06/20/2018 8:25:39 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Agree people need to heed the law of the land even if you put up a sign NOT YOURS they thing they can do what they please some peoples last mistake.


6 posted on 06/20/2018 8:31:36 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
But it’s an attractive one! 😁
7 posted on 06/20/2018 9:38:58 AM PDT by jdsteel (Americans are Dreamers too!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson