Posted on 06/27/2018 11:39:31 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Edited on 06/27/2018 11:42:52 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
ESPN
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
The Seattle Times had multiple orgasms about this.
Well at least it resembles Penthouse and not Queer Quarterly.
Of course this is the fantasy.
The reality of 99% of dyke couples is they look like unkempt sumo wrestling grease monkeys.
LOL
Centuries from now, when historians are trying to determine the cause of the fall of western civilization, the evidence will be right in front of them....
How did they manage to find female pro athletes that are gay, that must be pretty rare.
I can never understand why people pose for photos like this.
ALSO - I can never understand why celebrity women allow themselves to be photographed in sexy underwear. I’m thinking of Megan Kelly, for example. If you are trying to cultivate a “professional” image, doesn’t this defeat the purpose?
However, those pics of Greg Norman have me inspired to redouble my efforts to get in better shape.
ROTFL. And ESPN wonders why nobody watches that crap anymore. Their “In Yo FACE, AMERICA! attitude has backfired on them BIGTIME!
So sick of this cr@p being forced on the masses.
Our area Biz Journal’s latest issue showcases biz’s that support Pride week.
You know a former phb-ette of mine?
Again with the politics ESPN? Really?
So, check, first nude gay athlete couple on cover. So excited to wonder what their next big first would be.
Lesbians that don’t play softball or play in the WNBA?
ESPN is 80% owned by Walt Disney ... it’s all faggotry, all the time.
They certainly are a predictable lot.
Anything they agree with: 'historic.'
Anything they don't: 'controversial' or 'troubling.'
Sorry, Hudson, but the Civil War was historic. D-Day was historic. The moon landing was historic.
Calling this 'historic' demonstrates a woefully narrow, self-involved view of history or - more likely - is the usual bombast meant to camouflage the trivial or the vulgar.
The left celebrates this stuff, talks about how “empowering” it is, then in the next breath they complain about the “objectification” of women’s bodies.
ESPN has a magazine?
Like in the days of Lot. Bible prophecy happening in real time. Be ready.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.