Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarMema

The Life At Conception Act would render Roe v. Wade an irrelevant arcane piece of U.S. legal history. It doesn’t technically overturn Roe v. Wade but it does remove the basis for it, the definition of “personhood,” so Roe v. Wade would be meaningless.

It is Congress + a president that could and should eliminate Roe v. Wade not the judiciary.


5 posted on 07/02/2018 3:16:15 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
It is Congress + a president that could and should eliminate Roe v. Wade not the judiciary.

45 years since R v. W, so why hasn't it happened? If I recall, every Republican president in the past 45 years has been opposed to abortion...........

Accept the fact that it ain't gonna happen in our lifetime..........

13 posted on 07/02/2018 3:33:57 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Mother nature is a serial killer......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye

It is Congress + a president that could and should eliminate Roe v. Wade not the judiciary.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

100% correct.
The law of the land is supposed to be passed by Congress and signed by the President, not made up out of the penumbras by black robed tyrants,


21 posted on 07/02/2018 6:15:01 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson