Posted on 07/02/2018 9:21:06 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Amy Barrett, the federal circuit court judge who many are speculating could be President Trumps next Supreme Court nominee, didnt sound like his biggest fan before the election in 2016.
During a November 3rd, 2016 speech at Jacksonville University, Barrett said who knows what a Trump court would look like, and even said that she was worried about either candidate choosing another justice.
Hes obviously not bound to do so. I think it would be maybe more of a mixed bag. I think maybe Trump would appoint some that were more in the mold of Scalia, maybe some more in the mold of Kennedy who knows? I think we may well end up with a moderate to more conservative court on judicial role. I think it is safe to say it probably wouldnt be as hard to the left-leaning side on the approach to constitutional questions as, as Hillary would.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
For me this is not a male/female issue. I was all for Barrett, but this article is troubling.
I know what I was thinking on Nov 3, 2016.
Reading her words leads me to think she voted for Egg McMuffin.
She didn’t trust Trump and said so in public days before the election. Maybe she voted for Hillary. I don’t trust her. Go to the next candidate, male or female.
Oh the horror!
I think you should watch the video.
“NO MORE WOMEN ON THE SCOTUS!”
Yes, and if America is to survive the 19th amendment has to go, too.
Cruz said worse and a lot here want him on the Supremes.
As I posted above, I wasn’t always sure about Trump in 2016. So I can’t blame Barrett for having doubts.
Chuck Schumer hits Supreme Court contender Amy Coney Barrett over abortion, Obamacare
Washington Examiner
Posted on 07/02/2018 4:17:10 PM PDT by springwater13
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3667896/posts
That completely disqualified her. We have a hard and fast rule. No baby killers. Why does the left getl litmus tests and we dont? She is a Souter!! No more !!!
Having reservations about potential nominees is not quite the same as "Never Trump". You zealots are beyond annoying.
What happened was they hid rinos in the list of 25. Trump had better not do that to his political base . We demand clear views on baby killing. That decision was wrong, morally and legally!! We won the election for Trump. We want abortion overturned as a denial of civil rights of these babies. Civil rights are not returned to the states. These babies civil rights are denied!! Women have the choice of no sex!!
Bulla
Her track record is solid right
Her idol is Anton Scalia
No kidding
Why all this babe hate?
Hell who birthed these posters?
A right wing stork?
No some evolving woman I assume.
Barrett is a staunch New Orleans Catholic with SEVEN CHILDREN
and has made very conservative statements and is absolutely hated by the Left and media
Good choice fallopian or not
Plus shes pretty as hell
Pretty women are much less likely to be bitter barren evolvers
Amen
Im a chavanist tang chaser from so last century but this lady is first rate pick
I like her
Plus one
Barrett is a dream pick in many ways....you see what I did there
She has seven kids and is on record over and over about her pro life views
Show me a female judge that is the ideological equivalent of Scalia. Not possible . . ever.
Yeah. Excuse me if I'm wrong, but I can't recall one in my lifetime that has turned out well (and I'm old!). That other "leading candidate" may be conservative in some regards but he is a long time Swamp critter. Don't need that for certain.
Or perhaps she is a hard-core conservative who didn't trust Trump to keep his word on everything. I didn't either, and I'm thrilled to say I was wrong.
Right on the mark.
Give me another Scalia, Thomas or Gorsuch please?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.