Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Remove three Californias plan from the ballot, [CA] Supreme Court says
fresno bee ^ | July 18, 2018 | BY TARYN LUNA (sacbee)

Posted on 07/18/2018 2:17:17 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: FLT-bird

“Occupied Northern Virginia off of Virginia”

The sad part is that if you look at Virginia going back to the 1960’s, NoVa was the most Republican part of the state. The rest of the state was Dem - albeit former Byrd Democrats who were conservative but would never ever consider the idea of switching parties.

In order to win statewide back then, a GOP candidate needed to rack up really good numbers in NoVa and then perform reasonably well in the Valley and Va Beach.

Nowadays, a statewide GOP candidate needs to only not get slaughtered badly in NoVa to win statewide.


21 posted on 07/18/2018 2:41:18 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Not sure why some people here are cheering this.

This court just decided that a proposal should be removed from the ballot because it may be too “hard” to pull off if it passes.

That’s not the court’s issue to decide. If it passes, and ultimately falls apart, then so much for that, but the signatures were legitimately collected, and it ought to get its vote.


22 posted on 07/18/2018 2:43:59 PM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

If done without the heat of a civil war, it would be an adiabatic path.


23 posted on 07/18/2018 2:47:37 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

No one actually thought the state would ever allow a vote on such a thing, right?


24 posted on 07/18/2018 2:53:16 PM PDT by Bullish (My tagline is here. you just can't see it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Obama will get his 57 states and more


25 posted on 07/18/2018 2:56:51 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

“...Obama will get his 57 states and more...”
The only thing that foreign POS should deserves to get is a free, lifetime stay in a cell at GITMO.


26 posted on 07/18/2018 3:00:01 PM PDT by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

Minneapolis in MN also.


27 posted on 07/18/2018 3:05:01 PM PDT by Cheerio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
If any states deserve to break apart, it should be downstate IL and upstate NY.

Those picks are more sensible than some others. Some people think you could actually separate all the big cities in a state from the rural areas and make them two separate states. That won't happen. And if it did, pretty quickly you'd have new state capitals swarming with the bureaucrats and liberals. Springfield and Albany are already swarming with bureaucrats and liberals, so your proposal looks more realistic than some of the others people come up with.

28 posted on 07/18/2018 3:11:16 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
the robes are scared.
29 posted on 07/18/2018 3:29:01 PM PDT by Chode ( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wilderness Conservative

If it becomes three states, each one will get to elect 2/3 of a Senator.


30 posted on 07/18/2018 3:29:45 PM PDT by Montaignes Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Thanks Jim Robinson.

31 posted on 07/18/2018 3:29:56 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

While I think this is a very bad idea, it pisses me off that it’s a COURT saying it cannot be done.


32 posted on 07/18/2018 3:31:00 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

San Diego in one, LA in another, and San Francisco and Berkeley in the third. Should it be called Fudgepackistan, or Snowflakia?


33 posted on 07/18/2018 3:31:23 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Good. This plan was a scam as it left all three territories conveniently dominated by big cities, which would ensure all would produce Democrat results.


34 posted on 07/18/2018 3:40:43 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Beaten by the EnviroNazis, go figure. Do it anyway, f-them.


35 posted on 07/18/2018 3:41:20 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

“If we get the necessary petitions, an overwhelming number of people to agree and then we all vote on it - it beccomes so! This is Democracy!”

“Hang on there partner. You can’t just go voting yourself into changing the lives of millions of people. You gotta have some sense about this. First, bring the idea to the professionals voted in to evaluate the plan and it’s effects. Then we will vote on how to proceed. This is a Republic.”

Oh Californians must be CRYING


36 posted on 07/18/2018 3:45:19 PM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

Re Detroit: add in Flint and Saginaw.

CC


37 posted on 07/18/2018 3:46:18 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (Do you know what really burns my ass? A flame about 3 feet high.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
This would have been a good opportunity to start over. The steps would be:

1. California loses statehood and becomes a territory.
2. The territory is split into 3 parts.
3. Each part must apply for statehood independently.
4. With California not participating, Congress should pass a law limiting new state admissions to 1 per decade.
5. Each new territory would be administered by a Governor appointed by the duly elected President.
6. All voter registrations in the territory would require voter ID and proof of US citizenship.
7. A territory must operate with a balanced budget for the 5 years prior to admission as a state.
8. Holding any political office or law degree in the territory would require voter ID and proof of citizenship.
38 posted on 07/18/2018 3:46:54 PM PDT by Ragnar54 (Obama replaced Osama as America's worst enemy and Al Qaeda's financier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
"Unconstitutional anyway, needs the consent of Congress 1st."

It needs consent. That doesn't have to come before a vote on the initiative though. The initiative isn't unconstitutional.

39 posted on 07/18/2018 4:26:23 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

I agree


40 posted on 07/18/2018 4:47:43 PM PDT by olivia3boys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson