Posted on 09/14/2018 11:08:51 AM PDT by kingattax
The FBI will not be investigating Sen. Dianne Feinsteins (D-CA) last-second attempt to smear Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
After countless hours of hearings, a number of in-depth background checks, thousands of questions asked and answered, and numerous one-on-one meetings with senators of both parties, at the very last second Feinstein dramatically released a letter (she has reportedly had in her possession for months) to the FBI.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
MC Hammer!!
Same type of smear job used on Roy Moore.
How the media can scratch their heads in wonderment at the notion that they are truly fake news is beyond me...
As to DiFi......she and her husband need to be locked up for a whole bunch of corruption reasons.
The FBI should be investigating Feinstein.
Brett Kavanaugh, President Trumps Supreme Court nominee, held a woman down, covered her mouth and tried to force himself on her while drunk at a party in high school, she alleges in a shocking letter ...
seriousness of charges not nature of evidence.
where is Glorious All-rood? There’s money to be made here, Gloria!
could look like this crazy gal... and she hasn't had a kiss since the 80's
"Bait" is something you use to trick someone or something into going for.
Leftwing "journalist"/propagandist did not need to be baited to go for any lie - even those they know to be lies - if it was against Trump or conservatism.
A better title would have been:
"FBI Not Interested in Feinsteins Kavanaugh Hoax but Pro Journos Take the Baton"
The media and the dems (excuse the redundancy) are not interested in truth. They want to destroy Trump and Kavanaugh.
The media are the fluffers for the rat party. Their job is to keep the sheep excited and agitated until election day, when they find out how screwed they really are.
Between this pathetic attempt at a good man and the non-anonymous responses by 65 good women, DiFi hurt the Dems even more and proved how squeaky clean Kavanaugh really is.
WIKI-—Making false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) is the common name for the United States federal crime laid out in Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code, which generally prohibits knowingly and willfully making false or fraudulent statements, or concealing information, in “any matter within the jurisdiction” of the federal government of the United States,[1] even by merely denying guilt when asked by a federal agent.[2]
A number of notable people have been convicted under the section, including Martha Stewart,[3] Rod Blagojevich,[4] Michael T. Flynn,[5] Rick Gates,[6] Scooter Libby,[7] Bernard Madoff,[8] and Jeffrey Skilling.[9]
This statute is used in many contexts. Most commonly, prosecutors use this statute to reach cover-up crimes such as perjury, false declarations, and obstruction of justice and government fraud cases.[10]
Its earliest progenitor was the False Claims Act of 1863. In 1934, the requirement of an intent to defraud was eliminated. This was to prosecute successfully, under the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 (NIRA), the producers of “hot oil”, i.e. oil produced in violation of restrictions established by NIRA. In 1935, NIRA was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
The statute spells out this purpose in subsection 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a), which states:
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device[ , ] a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331),[11] imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUGBJA-eYEY
Anyone who can write such strong lyrics at age eight deserves to be a Supreme Court Justice, even if he did get his babysitter pregnant.
“...I think a full scale Socialist RAT rebellion breaks out if PDJT gets one or two more nominees....”
Agree. However, I hope he gets at least 2 more. Let the socialist/communist go into full scale revolt. It’s time to bring their BS to a head once and for all, and put and end to it for good. A revolt would make the perfect excuse to totally eliminate em.
The letter, which was referred to the bureau by Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Dianne Feinstein on Wednesday, was obtained by the New Yorker on Friday.
And just how did the New Yorker get the letter?
exactly...the “Kavanaugh hearing” was just a warm-up for the real
insanity that will happen in the next SCOTUS nomination.
I have heard RUMORS that the DemocRATS have offered to DROP the smear campaign against Justice Kavanaugh IF President Trump HALTS the declassification of the FISA documents. I say NO DEAL! The accuser is nothing but a tawdry, lying slut.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.