ESPN likely wanted to get rid of her sooner but they didn't want to be seen as attacking a woman of color who was 'speaking truth to power' about Trump.
Now that the controversy died down it's safe to get rid of her.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: yesthatjallen
I thought this was old news weeks ago that she was out at ESPN. Supposedly they wanted to be non political but then on the same day they had another story that was political.
Forked tongue.
23 posted on
09/14/2018 12:41:46 PM PDT by
Boomer
To: yesthatjallen
The protective coloration didn’t work?
24 posted on
09/14/2018 12:45:58 PM PDT by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: yesthatjallen
She was basically sent from an anchor job on their flagship show, to working in the basement mailroom. I’m sure she thought she would return in triumph at some point, but finally figured out it was not gonna happen. She may land a spot on some other sports network, or may end up wishing she had kept her cushy but invisible job in the basement.
26 posted on
09/14/2018 2:07:53 PM PDT by
ETCM
To: yesthatjallen
ESPN was good when it wasn’t owned by Disney. When it was owned by Getty and Hearst media, it was the best...now, I don’t watch it...
28 posted on
09/14/2018 2:44:07 PM PDT by
Deplorable American1776
(Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
To: yesthatjallen
29 posted on
10/02/2018 3:56:42 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson