Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Seidman talking about how there will be a strategy that will "emerge" and that it might defeat Kavanaugh is around the 3:25 mark of the video.
1 posted on 09/21/2018 8:16:25 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: lasereye

Any appointment made by the Senate, I insist that I have ultimate veto power, period. I’ll figure out why, send an op-ed to WaPo, and I demand to be heard! No peace, no appointments!


2 posted on 09/21/2018 8:20:59 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye

“And whether or not it ultimately defeats the nominee it will, I think, help people understand why it’s so important that they vote.”

Although it’s hard to believe, the Democrats seem to think their ridiculous antics this past month will rile up more of their base than it will our base.

I sure hope they are wrong about that...


3 posted on 09/21/2018 8:21:04 PM PDT by Junk Silver ("It's a little hard to herd people onto trains when they're shooting at you." SirLurkedalot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye

She’s right about the importance of voting. If you’re a registered Republican and don’t vote in Nov., you might as well become a democrat.


4 posted on 09/21/2018 8:23:03 PM PDT by bigbob (Trust Sessions. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye

I expect Grassley on Monday morning as soon as the vote is over to send a Referral for Criminal Prosecution to the DOJ for Everyone Involved in the Conspiracy to Defraud the Government

https://www.justice.gov/jm/criminal-resource-manual-923-18-usc-371-conspiracy-defraud-us

..”The statute is broad enough in its terms to include any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing or defeating the lawful function of any department of government . “

.. To conspire to defraud the United States means primarily to cheat the Government out of property or money, but it also means to interfere with or obstruct one of its lawful governmental functions by deceit, craft or trickery, or at least by means that are dishonest. It is not necessary that the Government shall be subjected to property or pecuniary loss by the fraud, but only that its legitimate official action and purpose shall be defeated by misrepresentation, chicane or the overreaching of those charged with carrying out the governmental intention.

Thus, if the defendant and others have engaged in dishonest practices in connection with a program administered by an agency of the Government, it constitutes a fraud on the United States under Section 371


5 posted on 09/21/2018 8:23:57 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye

The ‘Rats keeping dancing closer and closer to the fire pit.


7 posted on 09/21/2018 8:30:10 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye

Indeed - Ford’s accusation is the strategy.


8 posted on 09/21/2018 8:32:49 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye

Yes. “Strategy” being DiFi’s “letter” that she conveniently will not share with the committee. How often is a crucial piece of evidence withheld by a committee member from the other committee members?

I think DiFi is completely senile, and a lot of this insanity is sympathetic colleagues trying to cover for her.


9 posted on 09/21/2018 8:33:08 PM PDT by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye
...where she was instrumental in convincing Anita Hill to go public with her claim that Clarence Thomas sexually harassed her.”...exactly what happened this time around - had a patsy who thought she would get away with dropping a charge against the candidate from the shadows - then she was outed by somebody - or maybe outed herself according to some at WaPo - and now has to face the music and testify - whether she'll be able bring it off is questionable...
10 posted on 09/21/2018 8:38:31 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye

It would be very interesting to know HOW the committee got a copy of this conference call !!!!!


11 posted on 09/21/2018 8:38:41 PM PDT by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye

This will happen at the cost of branding the Dems the party that cried wolf about a supposed darling issue. Why are they taking that bait?


12 posted on 09/21/2018 8:40:17 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Tryin' hard to win the No-Bull Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye

Looks like a vile plot to destroy the career, reputation and life of a fine Christian man.


13 posted on 09/21/2018 8:43:29 PM PDT by allendale (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye

“...that Seidman, who also advised Anita Hill to testify against Clarence Thomas in 1991, is giving advice to Dr. Christine Blasey...”

Looks like tidy-didy-seidie’s gonna’ be 0 for 2.


14 posted on 09/21/2018 8:54:19 PM PDT by budj (combat vet, 2nd of 3 generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

I wish Ruth Ginsburg would die today.


16 posted on 09/21/2018 10:28:16 PM PDT by ssfromla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye

And that’s what Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans are pandering to. Shame!


18 posted on 09/22/2018 12:04:45 AM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye

I hope Kavanaugh and/or his wife sue the crap out of Seidman and Ford and Katz.

I’d pay for a front row seat in court for that hearing.


21 posted on 09/22/2018 1:07:52 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye

Hmmm, sort of like “Insurance”


23 posted on 09/22/2018 1:54:32 AM PDT by Pollard (If you don't understand what I typed, you haven't read the classics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye

Its called a strategy, we need to help Trump defeat this cancer, VOTE!


24 posted on 09/22/2018 3:44:00 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye

After Kavanaugh is confirmed, Trump’s next SCOTUS pick will be the more conservative and female Amy Coney Barrett. The commie Dems are so screwed. They won’t have anything to pin on her.


26 posted on 09/22/2018 9:26:52 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (End the Mueller Gestapo now. Free the Donald.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lasereye
Looks like she's done quite well for herself..

She definitely knows her way to the buffet bar.

Work with sows, become one.

27 posted on 09/22/2018 10:27:13 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson