Posted on 10/10/2018 5:15:46 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
A despicable, weaponized, filthy mob.
They were called Brown Shirts.
Obviously the left has no idea what the constitution is or what any of its words say or mean.
MOBS isolate and confront individuals, bordering on ASSAULT.
"Just because you're PARANOID doesn't mean they're not after you."
They are really terrified of the word, “Mob.”
So....we use it more!!!
Democrat Mob! Democrat Mob! Democrat Mob!
Democrat Mob! Democrat Mob! Democrat Mob!
Democrat Mob! Democrat Mob! Democrat Mob!
Lemon tells opposing view to shut up and then sites the First Amendment. LOL You have a right to speak UNLESS you are on Lemon’s show.
You are very wrong.
The left knows all to well that their disgusting in your face tactics are protected by the First amendment. They also know that the constitution essentially provides protection against any direct retribution.
There is no legal defense against the disgusting tactics.
VIOLENT, THREATENING, INTIMIDATING Democrat Mob.
I first heard her on the Hugh Hewitt Show years ago. Neither one is very “conservative,” although media calls them that. Her deceased husband worked for Obama.
I will be just fine with CNN talking about MOBS all the way up to election time. I think we should spend the next four weeks focusing on definitions and examples of mobs.
Trespassing on a restaurant’s property and disrupting it’s business is not protected by the First Amendment.
You can go to the park, stand on a soapbox, and tell the trees that you hate the guy eating in that restaurant across the street. That’s protected speech.
Can we chase Democrats out of the country and claim its our 1st amendment right?
“”she wanted to “move past the ‘M’ word” because it is “part of the weaponization of what’s happening now on the right.””
Could we please go back to our normal vocabulary words without all the geegaws thrown out there by these idiots? I don’t think they could exist if they didn’t throw in with the crowd and speak as they do..
theoretically you are correect
In practice you are depending on a third party to prevent legal verbal assault on your person. Depending on a third party to protect your self is very weak protection.
In fact it is no protection at all.
No, clearly it is not. That position comes from ignorance of the founding documents.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
This section of the Constitution may play a role in this matter.
The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.
How about a MORONIC GAY THUG?
you need to get the language right
Moronic Queer Thug.
using PC term gay is detrimental to America
PERFECT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.