No he really didn’t it was more like 78% chance.
So his prediction last time only differed from reality by 78 percentage points. Not much of an endorsement for his 2018 prediction. A coin flip would have a better chance of being right than Nate Silver.
And at the time, I thought all of this "78% chance" and "92% chance" was a bunch of hogwash.
HC loses two tossups, North Carolina and Florida, Trump wins Ohio, which he was projected to do, HC was toast if Trump just wins one other rust belt state.
How can two states, NC and Florida, be on a knife's edge on who would win, and Clinton all of a sudden had these astronomical odds of winning? What am I missing?
Or was it pure BS psyops by the media and liberal pollsters to demoralize the Republican voters?