T^he ruling is wrong on its face.
For there to be a due process claim there must be a LEGAL process to violate. This is an administrative rule, not a legal right.
This judge quite simply does not know the law.
There is also a problem here about the judiciary ruling on things that not in its purview. AGAIN.
Trump needs to have his people RUSH this to SCOTUS and get a ruling in general about the judiciary meddling in Executive Branch powers as stated in the Constitution.
Damn sissy GOPers never challenged ALL the illegal powers obozo arrogated to himself. Now Trump is afraid to tell the courts who are ruling against him simply because they don’t like him “now enforce it.”
>
Damn sissy GOPers never challenged ALL the illegal powers obozo arrogated to himself. Now Trump is afraid to tell the courts who are ruling against him simply because they don’t like him “now enforce it.”
>
Sissies? No, birds-of-a-feather. Silence is consent (and I don’t mean any possible bluster & bloviation in front of the mics/cameras)
For all the fun made vs. Leftists, at least their electorate KNOW and approve of their party’s path. It’s the (R)N(C) that seem to be Pavlov’s dog (every election “R” ticket...*bitch bitch bitch*....straight “R” ticket....*bitch*...). Blind to the obvious and unwilling to make a change on their part to make a bigger change.
>
For there to be a due process claim there must be a LEGAL process to violate. This is an administrative rule, not a legal right.
This judge quite simply does not know the law.
>
Incorrect. They KNOW the Law, they don’t care to FOLLOW. There is *SO* much B.S. ‘precedent’, they can use *any* single sentence from the spectrum to decree however they wish.
I can’t recall the plain, simple English of the Constitution were cited and adhered (”Though the 2nd says ‘shall NOT be infringed’, ABC vs. XYZ stated...”).
Again, look to the failure of Congress, and specifically the (R)N(C) for it’s consent by silence.