That Oval Office sit-down? Pelosi and Schumer got skunked.

american thinker ^ | 12/13/2018 | patricia mccarthy

[bitt]

There are thousands of families in the U.S. who have lost children and family members to illegal aliens in a variety of horrific ways. In that sure-to-go-down-in-history Oval Office confab, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer effectively let us know that they don't care about us or our losses. They need Democrat voters; that is their abiding goal.

The theatrics in the Oval Office on Tuesday morning were just that: great theater. Trump always steps ahead of his opponents, and he set up Schumer and Pelosi. He began his discussion with the press in the room. Pelosi came in spouting "transparency" but could not wait to get the media out. Trump saw to it that each of them revealed their preference for illegal aliens over American citizens. It was delicious, gratifying.

The Democrats pretend to be so compassionate, but in fact, they are hardcore pols. They do not give a moment's thought to the consequences of our cities being flooded with illegal migrants or how they affect Americans who do not live in gated communities or behind the walls like the ones that surround their homes. They offer no solutions beyond another "continuing resolution." Their "we are the good guys" act was exposed for all to see. Those two, Pelosi and Schumer, are hateful, power-mad reprobates who will do and say anything to win, to be on top. They want to let millions of third-world refugees into the U.S. in order to defeat Republicans. That's their plan, and they are sticking to it.

But on Tuesday morning, Trump had them for breakfast. It was a glorious sight to behold. Pelosi's hand gestures were hilarious, clearly practiced and ridiculous.

[bitt]

p

[Yo-Yo]

That Oval Office sit-down? Pelosi and Schumer got skunked.

Of course they did. In a battle of wits, those two were unarmed.

[gubamyster]

skunked = schlonged

[DOC44]

Pelosi will be even more pizzed off when someone explains what happened there and how Trump b.... slapped her on national TV. Senile old women, Pelosi AND Schumer.

[gaijin]

Transparency:

Often talked about, rarely displayed.

Except by TRUMP.

[Trump.Deplorable]

Transparency is another word the Left loves to throw around and pretend they are but in reality they are not.

When Wiki Leaks forced them to be transparent by leaking their emails online, they hated it. Wiki Leaks or whoever did not create those emails, the democrats did. They hate the idea about transparency.

[Tired of Taxes]

Trump showed that Pelosi and Schumer just wanted to put on a show for the cameras.

They wanted to get a few digs in. They wanted to place the blame of a possible shutdown on him. They were there to play the game Party Politics.

Trump came across as reasonable and sensible in his responses.

[Slyfox]

[Amendment10]

"Trump saw to it that each of them revealed their preference for illegal aliens over American citizens undocumented Democratic voters over majority Trump supporters."

There! Fixed it.

[Old Yeller]

But the general public has no idea. No fake news manipulated the film so much it makes it look like Trump was pwned.

[V_TWIN]

I heard cnn had pelosi and schumers audio turned up louder that the POTUS.

Despicable.

[rdcbn]

Pelosi and Schumer are nothing but cynical, hypocritical posers and grand standers

Problem is, very few people are better at exposing posers and putting them in their place than President Trump

Nobody, but nobody does media grand standing like The Donald .

Trump has elevated media grandstanding to a form of high art

[DPMD]

Pelosi and schumer are collectivists; individual lives have no meaning or worth to them; other than, of course, theirs.

[momincombatboots]

I will believe the title when a budget resolution without full wall funding gets a great big Veto... until then it’s just bilateral blather.

[CatOwner]

Take an honest poll. I bet a majority didn’t see it that way. I bet a majority didn’t even see the event. Most now in this country want their life paid for by the government.

[dragnet2]

Pelosi; “We want transparency, but Mr. President we shouldn’t be be having a debate in front of the press”.

Ya can’t make this kind of stuff up.

[timestax]

bttt

[alloysteel]

But would they ever ADMIT defeat? No, because they could NEVER walk back an admission. But they can endlessly keep trying to reinterpret what the public audience to this confrontation say with their own lyin’ eyes.

Groucho Marx said it first, “Who you gonna believe.....”

[SantosLHalper]

Reminds me of the time I had to complain to HR about a department manager's bullying and abuse of his subordinates.
He came to me a few days later, while I was on break and wanted to “speak” to me
in private.
“Nope. I have nothing to hide. Whatever you have to say, you can say it here(at least 6 other people were on break at the same time, many on whose behalf I talked to HR ) in front of everybody.”
He turned beet red, his eyes teared up and he clenched his fist and jaw, a sure sign of a psychopath to me. I can only assume he wanted to use his considerable size to intimidate me to change my statement.
He turned and stormed away, he didn't last another month.
Asshat.