Posted on 01/24/2019 10:58:34 AM PST by detective
National pro-life leader Lila Rose described New York State’s new law that allows abortions up until the day of birth as “barbaric and inhumane,” and “no different than infanticide.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
The next very short step is to legalize and encourage infanticide.
Children playing God
The law allows killing a baby up to the due date.
The due date is an estimate, made by the doctor.
A baby born 3 months early has a good chance of growing up to be a normal adult.
This allows killing viable babies.
This is murder.
Where is the (rude word for fornicate)-head in Rome on this?
“Where is the (rude word for fornicate)-head in Rome on this?”
Too busy protecting his gay friends.
This charade began and will end when Republicans recognize and counter the Liberal/Progressive's all-out war to preserve their quest for imposing socialism on the American population, along with the bottom-line necessity for socialism: population control.
" Dr. Kathi Aultman told a U.S. Congressional committee in 2017 that she referred to unborn babies as 'fetuses' when killing them in abortions but 'babies' when they were wanted; and she regretted the incongruity. She also said she was fascinated by the 'tiny but perfectly formed limbs, intestines, kidneys, and other organs' of aborted babies."
Aultman, in the first clause of her statement summarizes the semantic trickery Liberals/Progressives knowingly used to implement their takeover of the minds of American citizens before 1973 in order to impose their population control method of destroying babies in order to facilitate the goals of socialism for America.
Please note especially the first paragraph highlighted and quoted below from the Liberty Fund Library "A Plea for Liberty: An Argument Against Socialism and Socialistic Legislation," edited by Thomas Mackay (1849 - 1912), Chapter 1, final paragraphs from Edward Stanley Robertson's essay, "The Impracticability of Socialism":Note the writer's emphasis that the "scheme of Socialism" requires what he calls "the power of restraining the increase in population"--long the essential and primary focus of the Democrat Party in the U. S.:
"I have suggested that the scheme of Socialism is wholly incomplete unless it includes a power of restraining the increase of population, which power is so unwelcome to Englishmen that the very mention of it seems to require an apology. I have showed that in France, where restraints on multiplication have been adopted into the popular code of morals, there is discontent on the one hand at the slow rate of increase, while on the other, there is still a 'proletariat,' and Socialism is still a power in politics.An examination of the history of nations reveals the long and arduous struggle by human beings for individual liberty--from kings, from masters, from whatever description fitted those other human beings who gained power and exercised it over their fellow citizens.
I.44
"I have put the question, how Socialism would treat the residuum of the working class and of all classes—the class, not specially vicious, nor even necessarily idle, but below the average in power of will and in steadiness of purpose. I have intimated that such persons, if they belong to the upper or middle classes, are kept straight by the fear of falling out of class, and in the working class by positive fear of want. But since Socialism purposes to eliminate the fear of want, and since under Socialism the hierarchy of classes will either not exist at all or be wholly transformed, there remains for such persons no motive at all except physical coercion. Are we to imprison or flog all the 'ne'er-do-wells'?
I.45
"I began this paper by pointing out that there are inequalities and anomalies in the material world, some of which, like the obliquity of the ecliptic and the consequent inequality of the day's length, cannot be redressed at all. Others, like the caprices of sunshine and rainfall in different climates, can be mitigated, but must on the whole be endured. I am very far from asserting that the inequalities and anomalies of human society are strictly parallel with those of material nature. I fully admit that we are under an obligation to control nature so far as we can. But I think I have shown that the Socialist scheme cannot be relied upon to control nature, because it refuses to obey her. Socialism attempts to vanquish nature by a front attack. Individualism, on the contrary, is the recognition, in social politics, that nature has a beneficent as well as a malignant side. The struggle for life provides for the various wants of the human race, in somewhat the same way as the climatic struggle of the elements provides for vegetable and animal life—imperfectly, that is, and in a manner strongly marked by inequalities and anomalies. By taking advantage of prevalent tendencies, it is possible to mitigate these anomalies and inequalities, but all experience shows that it is impossible to do away with them. All history, moreover, is the record of the triumph of Individualism over something which was virtually Socialism or Collectivism, though not called by that name. In early days, and even at this day under archaic civilisations, the note of social life is the absence of freedom. But under every progressive civilisation, freedom has made decisive strides—broadened down, as the poet says, from precedent to precedent. And it has been rightly and naturally so.
I.46
"Freedom is the most valuable of all human possessions, next after life itself. It is more valuable, in a manner, than even health. No human agency can secure health; but good laws, justly administered, can and do secure freedom. Freedom, indeed, is almost the only thing that law can secure. Law cannot secure equality, nor can it secure prosperity. In the direction of equality, all that law can do is to secure fair play, which is equality of rights but is not equality of conditions. In the direction of prosperity, all that law can do is to keep the road open. That is the Quintessence of Individualism, and it may fairly challenge comparison with that Quintessence of Socialism we have been discussing. Socialism, disguise it how we may, is the negation of Freedom. That it is so, and that it is also a scheme not capable of producing even material comfort in exchange for the abnegations of Freedom, I think the foregoing considerations amply prove." EDWARD STANLEY ROBERTSON
By whatever semantic maneuver those power holders chose to identify themselves, no matter how benevolent they purported to be, the end was the same: some individuals in the society or group were denied their Creator-endowed rights to be free. Today, the individuals most denied their freedom are those innocent lives in the womb who, if wanted, are called "children," and if, for some reason are inconvenient at the time, are called "fetuses," as Aultman averred.
Adolf Hitler would be proud..even he couldn’t come up with a idea like that..a FULL term baby being slaughtered right before delivery
Abortion is biological murder.
Almost as disturbing is the fact that the NY senate erupted into applause upon its passage and buildings were lit pink to celebrate the event. It’s like concentration camp guards celebrating another batch of Jews heading into the ovens or KGB agents high-fiving each other after the last Polish officer was shot.
I apologize, I realize that the first one to compare someone to a Nazi has lost the argument, but can you think of a non-Nazi/Stalinist equivalent?
So a woman near to term will just have a c-.section and when the baby is removed from her womb it will be killed. It would take a Dr. Menegle to do this. My father was an old time country doctor and delivered scores of babies mostly as home births. He often said that God would surely punish this country for allowing abortion. He could never have imagined the infantacide now legalized in New York. I agree with his premonition andthere will be a special place in hell for Gov. Cuomo and all in New York who voted for and condoned this monstrous evil.
This just makes me physically grieve over the monumental depravity of these people. And then to think that they would celebrate the slaughter of innocent life . . . unthinkable and infuriating.
Has anyone heard anything from Cardinal Dolan? Wonder why.... Then again most of us can imagine why he has been silenced.
Rush also stated earlier today that the NY Senate stood up and applauded passing a law which included if the full term baby survived the abortion, they could still kill the baby after it was born on the table. Satan has taken over.
This murder law also says, "It's between the woman, her family, and Doctor to determine her mental and emotional status". The stress of pregnancy aside, what makes the family or MD qualified regarding mental or emotional health? Aside from the short psyche rotation Interns do, isn't that what psychiatrists and psychologists are about?
Watching those baby-killers celebrate made my stomach turn. I hate them all and wish them as painful death as those innocent precious babies experience.
Murder is now legal in NY. Never did I think I’d see the day when the murder of a fully developed human being would be considered legal anywhere in the world and here it is in NY.
It’s so insane; I’m having trouble imagining how such a thing could happen.
Well, now that murder is legal in NY, I guess the first ones who should be murdered are those who made this law so they can start fresh with actual humans with a pulse and make a new law that makes it illegal.
We can simply call it retroactive abortion.
Soon, the penalty for murder will be a fine equal to the victim’s worth as valued by the government.
See what a sufficiently slippery slope can accomplish?
or, to put it differently:
Mary: John, I’m pregnant!
John: Mary, that’s wonderful! Do you know what it’ll be?
Mary: I don’t know yet, but I’m hoping it’ll be a human baby. After all, it’s just a clump of cells right now, silly!
Infanticide was an acceptable practice in the pagan world. Why would anyone be surprised that as paganism becomes the state religion, infanticide would follow?
It still comes down to the woman killing her own child. Laws shouldn’t facilitate it though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.