Ninth circuit= liberal judicial trash can
And when they rule against him, the President should immediately Rescind Every Emergency Order put in place by the Marxist Muslim Petulant Man Child, Bath House barry
Examples:
Experts: Legal challenges to Trump emergency declaration face uphill battle
The Law Will Be on Trump’s Side If He Declares an Emergency to Fund The Wall
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF COLORADO
STATE OF CONNECTICUT;
STATE OF DELAWARE;
STATE OF HAWAII;
STATE OF ILLINOIS;
STATE OF MAINE;
STATE OF MARYLAND;
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE OF MICHIGAN;
STATE OF MINNESOTA;
STATE OF NEVADA;
STATE OF NEW JERSEY;
STATE OF NEW MEXICO;
STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE OF OREGON;
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP,
in his official capacity as President of the United States of America;
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;
Trump has not moved any military construction money. It is his intent to do this in the last phase of his plan. It doesn't how many states run about with sound and fury, they can't ask the Courts to intervene until he actually does it. I think something that the courts call, "the matter is not yet ripe"
As for the emergency itself, it doesn't spend any money. Trump will use other statutes to do that. So either all of this was prepared before Trump announced the emergency and were, therefore, guessing; or they are not really serious.
“Maine is aggrieved by the actions of Defendants and has standing to bring this action because of the injury to the State and its residents caused by Defendants’ reduction of federal defense spending in Maine due to diversion of funding to the border wall,” one section of the suit reads.”
“The Russians Are Coming! The Russians Are Coming!” was just a movie, not a realistic threat to Maine.
I don’t get this.
I don’t have any citations at hand, but over the years I’ve read of District Court decisions being only effective in that District and that we’d have to wait for a Supreme Court outcome to know if the decisions was national or not.
I’ve read of the Supreme Court taking cases because different district courts came to different decisions.
So how does one lower level judge in a district get to issue a nationwide injunction?
If I was in the Fifth District Court, I’d be less than happy if some Ninth District schmuck issued an injunction I didn’t like and would not have issued, but I and my people have to follow it anyway.
Could judges in the Fifth District say “That’s nice Ninth, but not in our district”?
It should be filed in the DC Court if anywhere. Of course the liberals will pick the friendliest court. Another reason the 9th Circus should be chopped into smaller bits.
Non border states should have no standing. Texas is taking the brunt of this crap and we are tired of it.
I’m opposed to this.
The attorney general did not receive my permission.
Why didn’t the taxpayers of these States get a chance to vote if President Trump should be sued or not?
Can we sue the AGs for misrepresenting us?
Like sheep going to their slaughter. This is where the idiot libs are leading this country.
Two points;
Point 1-
“The litigation additionally includes allegations that Trump is violating the National Environmental Policy Act, by planning to build a wall that could impact the environment without first completing the necessary environmental impact reports.”
From Feb 11, 2019-
“The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled for the Trump administration Monday in a case challenging its use of waivers to bypass environmental regulations in constructing parts of the border wall.
Point 2-
“they allege, the federal funds could have been spent on their defense.”
This is dumbfounding, as the money Trump
wants to spend on the wall IS for their
defense...
This list of states should probably be used when making a decision about splitting the US. My guess is that big swaths of those states will want to go along with the rest of the country, leaving a bunch of urban areas that can’t grow their own food, and that generally don’t even produce anything other than ‘financial services’, to fend for themselves.
I’m not going to “agree” to read the article.. are the states all dem voting states? They want the illegal voters. If they couldn’t vote for 7 years plus citizenship.... or 20 years till vote possible.. the stuff the dems pull to get what they want.. is the crux of all the problems. They have turned into a really bad party.
Your Honor! Representing the Commonwealth of Virginia: Governor Ralph ‘Coonman’ Northam!!
Original jurisdiction is at SCOTUS, since a State is a party in the court proceeding.
Article 3, section 2:
“In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.”
Original jurisdiction means _only_ jurisdiction. No other court has and authority to hear, much less decide the case.
Follow the law of USA, POTUS.