Posted on 03/17/2019 10:11:51 PM PDT by Liz
Here’s another Jurist that needs to be taken out and horse-whipped!
The ghost of O bass hole, remains.
The agenda is the source of their law.
WTF! You American Citizens try that -—— 6 months for sure!
The judge needs to be disbarred and removed from the bench, and jailed.
Clear violation of his oaths to uphold the law.
I would encourage the citizens to forcibly remove the bastard. Rope and tree would work.
But let one of US do that and this Black-Robed Judiciarch would put us in prison for at least ten years.
And i say that bdcause if the judge isnt going to uphold the law he cant demand any citizen follow it.
He needs to be gone one way or another.
Thanks Liz. Unfit for the bench, but that's redundant, she was appointed by Obama.
TigersEye ruling: U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom is guilty of a high crime against the republic and the state of FL.
The Barackalypse continues.
Her. Beth. Judge Beth Bloom.
I have been around a while, and I have yet to hear of a female judge who rules by following precedent more than her own vague notions of who should "win" by whatever excuses she can concoct at the moment. They get some right from time to time, but overall, I have yet to follow one that I can consistently respect for their jurisprudence.
(However, I believe that she was correct in the Broward County school shooting ruling. There is no duty to defend, no matter how "nice" it sounds or how much we wish to pretend that it is so.)
Didn’t Chief Justice Roberts (thanks Bush Junior) lecture us/Trump recently, saying there was no such thing as an “Obama Judge” and that all his fellow black robed super-legislators were just great folks?
Falsifying documents is a very serious offense and is generally classified as a felony. This means that a person charged with falsifying documents may be subject to the following legal penalties: Having to pay a monetary fine;Incarceration in a prison facility
Depending on the gravity of the offense, as well as individual state laws, falsifying documents can result in a prison sentence of 5-10 years.
Also, if government documents or authorities were involved, the legal penalties may be more severe. Legal penalties may increase with repeat offenses. The penalty for falsifying government documents is outlined in the Crimes Act of 1958.
REFERENCE--Falsifying Government Documents. involves altering, changing, or modifying a document for the purpose of deception.......can also involve forgery and/or passing copies of false documents. Falsifying documents is usually done in connection with broader criminal aims, such as extortion, government fraud, tax evasion, money laundering, financing terrorism........
Types of documents commonly falsified may include:
◾Tax returns and income statements
◾Personal checks
◾Bank account records
◾Business record keeping books
◾Immigration documents (such as visas, passports, etc.)
◾Identification cards and birth certificates
Many different types of acts can be considered as falsifying a document, including:
◾Altering or misrepresenting factual information such as prices or monetary amounts
◾Stating false information when requested to provide truthful statements
◾Forging a signature
◾Using official letterheads without authorization
◾Concealing assets or property WRT obtaining federal/state grants))
◾Knowingly using or distributing a fake document
A person can only be held criminally liable if they are deliberately acting with the intention of deceiving or defrauding another party.
Yes....he did.
Gee, I always thought acquiring and presenting fake documents to get what wasn’t legally yours to get, was considered fraud. I think I’ll rustle myself up some fake federal/state documents to get myself a liquor license, or an electrician’s license, or a nursing license, and see how far that gets me.
#12. You are correct but many of Obama’s appointments as judges don’t give a damn about how the law is. They make their own law so I hope it reaches the Supreme Court. Nothing like getting your professional ass whipped by the Supremes in a good majority decision.
It makes one’s judicial career tenuous and a possible cause for being demoted or removed.
but they still are illegal,no ? It seems they should still be held over for DHS.
Scotus ruled there is no duty to defend. She just ruled the way scotus did. Her ruling wouldve gotten overturned.
And there isnt. But at thesame time then they shouldnt demand people disarm themselves either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.