Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I wonder how long it will be before the Democrats surrender our sovereignty to Mexico?
1 posted on 04/21/2019 9:44:16 AM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: antidemoncrat

Their Top is either reaming them a new one, or doing the same to the LT.


2 posted on 04/21/2019 9:50:03 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat

Punitive expedition needed. Push everyone in Mexico back from the border at least 10 miles. Shoot to kill all who stay.


3 posted on 04/21/2019 9:57:16 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat

For what it’s worth, I did a google map view of the border area of Clint, Texas where the story says this happened. I don’t know how authoritative Google Maps is, but it shows places where the actual border does not run down the middle of the Rio Grande, but some yards north of the river. This could be due to the fact that rivers do sometimes change their courses over the years and it has been agreed that the border will not change when this happens. Or it could be that Google maps is wrong. But it may not be as clear cut as we might think.


4 posted on 04/21/2019 10:07:24 AM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat

That is technically an act of war.


5 posted on 04/21/2019 10:11:30 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat

Regardless of their motivation, the Mexicans were wrong. Regardless of the numbers, the Americans were wrong to surrender. American soldiers should not hand over their weapons - they should if necessary hold the enemy off and call in an airstrike on any direct threat (okay, any threat other than Hillary, Pelosi, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, etc.).


7 posted on 04/21/2019 10:21:06 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat

Two whole cavalry companies? I think that the headline writer meant troopers, rather than troops.


11 posted on 04/21/2019 11:05:57 AM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat

Time to pull the army out and send in the Marines.


12 posted on 04/21/2019 11:24:53 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat
Given that interaction with armed cartel members, even armed cartel members also wearing the uniforms of the Mexican military is possible our soldiers should be traveling in groups large enough, and with enough arms, that anyone approaching them would not be in a position of superior firepower. If that means having an Apache gunship hovering over them so be it.

Meanwhile we've got the FBI trying to disarm civilians in the area and prevent them from stopping illegal entrants.

Time for Trump to get serious about border security.

13 posted on 04/21/2019 11:26:49 AM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat
I wonder how long it will be before the Democrats surrender our sovereignty to Mexico?

They already have, look at California!

14 posted on 04/21/2019 11:29:01 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat

Kinda reminds you of the Chinese Empire in its decadent period, when the Chinese couldn’t even prevent the British from selling opium to their population or nations as small as Portugal from ripping off chunks of Chinese territory and establishing their own law there.


15 posted on 04/21/2019 11:31:14 AM PDT by Savage Beast (The Trump Revolution is the Resistance to the Decadence of Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat
The Treaty of 1884 explicitly accepted the internationally established doctrine that the line of a river-defined border shall follow the changing path of the boundary river only in response to alluvial deposition, but that avulsion shall not affect the borderline.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamizal_dispute

There are two or three locations on the Rio Grande where this is an issue.

Clint Texas is NOT one of them.

If Mexican troops are on the north side of the border with weapons, they should be challenged and ordered back across the river.

That area is VERY well defined as to the river, the adjacent strips of land on both sides of the river between the two levees which in that area are about 100 to 150 yards apart.

In that area there could not have been a "mistake" as to the boundary.

I would suggest parking 2 - 3 Humvee with .50 BMG with thermal sights in that general area to insure there are no more "mistakes."

.

20 posted on 04/21/2019 11:43:10 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat

Um, that’s casus belli - an act of war.


22 posted on 04/21/2019 12:57:12 PM PDT by piytar (If it was not for double standards, the Democrats and the left would have NO standards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat

Search much?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?s=mexican+troops&ok=Search&q=quick&m=exact&o=time


26 posted on 04/21/2019 3:13:24 PM PDT by upchuck ("Bloggers" is the most abused forum on FR. Most posts made there should be in chat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat

I hope the President sees this on the news.


27 posted on 04/21/2019 3:39:05 PM PDT by CharleysPride (Peace, Freedom and Prosperity. Thank you, President Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat
George Herbert Walker Bush invaded Panama because the wife of a US Naval officer was detained by Panamanians and “threatened with sexual abuse.” Therefore, this situation should call for an invasion of Mexico.

But it won’t.

30 posted on 04/21/2019 4:14:52 PM PDT by SkyPilot (("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat

FYI: Texas was INVADED by the Mexican Army at 2:00 PM last Saturday, April 13, 2019. The Mexican Army forced the FIRST SURRENDER of American troops to a foreign power on American soil since the War of 1812. Make NO mistake - the Mexican troops KNEW EXACTLY where they were. They all have GPS. The border is not the wall, but the center of the Rio Grande river. The question is what drug mules they were “protecting” as they entered the US. Mexican Army troops have been found before as many as 9 or 10 miles into the US. This needs to STOP. American soldiers need LOADED RIFLES, and vehicle mounted machine guns, not UNLOADED HANDGUNS. And they need to be in MARKED ARMY VEHICLES, not unmarked civilian cars, or Border Patrol vehicles. I would venture to suggest we we need a few Abrams tanks down there for their psychological deterrent value.


32 posted on 04/21/2019 8:59:56 PM PDT by 2harddrive (Go to www.CodeIsFreeSpeech.com for 10 FREE 3D-printer gun blueprints!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson