Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Airlines to inspect Boeing 737 Max ENGINES after Southwest emergency landing in March
CBS News ^ | 30 Apr 2019 | Kris Van Cleave, Megan Towey, Brian Pascus

Posted on 05/06/2019 9:46:08 AM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: CondoleezzaProtege

This was my 737 Max8 Experience

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESAPaHlnpGo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfxk7EIOGZQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MN6MdS8keM0


21 posted on 05/06/2019 12:59:09 PM PDT by eaglestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

re: “Only the CFM LEAP engine is offered on the MAX. No choice.”

It’s NOT like this is a punch-ticket item, and the ECONOMICS of this engine are also a factor the customer weighs in on, to be sure! You don’t think that those who negotiated price and delivery ALSO didn’t have a say in the engines?


22 posted on 05/06/2019 1:18:16 PM PDT by _Jim (Save babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
It’s NOT like this is a punch-ticket item, and the ECONOMICS of this engine are also a factor the customer weighs in on, to be sure! You don’t think that those who negotiated price and delivery ALSO didn’t have a say in the engines?

Yes, that is what I am saying. The A320 NEO came about because of Pratt & Whitney developing the GTF Geared Turbofan engine which promised much better fuel efficiency than existing engines on the A320. CFM responded by developing the LEAP Leading Edge Aviation Propulsion engine. Both engines were offered for sale with the A320 NEO.

Boeing had to respond, and did so by designing the 737-8 MAX. Because of differences in the airframes between the A320 and the 737, there simply wasn't enough room to put the P&W GTF on the 737. Boeing could make the LEAP work, but with a slightly smaller fan diameter than that used on the A320, resulting in slightly less economy.

Because of this, the only engine that was offered with the 737-8 MAX was the CFM LEAP engine.

23 posted on 05/06/2019 1:35:10 PM PDT by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

The headline inferred Boeing built the engines. . .they didn’t and don’t.


24 posted on 05/06/2019 1:46:10 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?

I used to work for Boeing (10-yrs), and the customer gets to pick what engine manufacturer they want. They pay the cost of any adjustments and such.


25 posted on 05/06/2019 1:49:23 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paulie

“nrelated to this article, but important, is that affirmative action and lowering standards for ATC is insane”

AND flight examiners are now being hired by the FAA to assess pilots and certify their annual check-rides. . .AND these examiners are NOT pilots!!


26 posted on 05/06/2019 1:51:03 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I knew what you meant. . .


27 posted on 05/06/2019 1:52:11 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

“Boeing doesn’t make the engines, and the customer picks which engine they want.”

As near as I can tell, the CFM engine is the only one currently available for the 737 MAX series. That engine is the principal reason for the MAX because it delivers 15% better fuel economy.


28 posted on 05/06/2019 2:40:17 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

Good Aircraft
Good Engines of the customers choice
Bad decisions by Boeing to not have redundancy in a critical flight control system driven by computer that would override pilots.

I would happily fly in a 787 Max tomorrow if the pilots are aware of the non redundancy between the angle of attack indicator and the computer. Redundancy cost extra and the pilots did not know there was no redundacy. They thought they were flying an aircraft with multiple angle of attack indicators, which they were, with redundancy to the computer. They were not.

As per a post of yesterday to quote a 737 captain of 25 years now retired.

“Computers 2, Pilots 0.” He did not fly the Max but many previous models. He loved the 737. It is really a wonderful aircraft. Boeing will eat this big time.

I assure you there will be many internal memos from Boeing Engineers that will show the insanity of Boeing’s decisions.
Discovery in court will be a bitch on steroids for Boeing which is most sad. They do make superior aircraft.

When it all said and done one will find managerial decisions based on profits, not the engineers.


29 posted on 05/06/2019 3:17:59 PM PDT by cpdiii ( canecutter, deckhand, roughneck, geologist, pilot, pharmacist THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

No. The headline does not infer that Boeing built the engines, but that the engines are part of Boeing planes.


30 posted on 05/06/2019 4:40:28 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Wasting your time... Arguing with a serious know it all. You have always been correct, counts for nothing.


31 posted on 05/06/2019 7:10:55 PM PDT by SandwicheGuy (*The butter acts as a lubricant and speeds up the CPU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

You are right about management and engineers. Why Lockheed and Boeing got together... Lockheed was bean counters, Boeing was engineers.... Guess who won. And Chicago?


32 posted on 05/06/2019 7:18:00 PM PDT by SandwicheGuy (*The butter acts as a lubricant and speeds up the CPU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

No. It makes it seem the engines are Boeing engines (made by Boeing).


33 posted on 05/06/2019 8:30:08 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

Incompetent third-world “pilots.”

As Ron White says, “you can’t fix stupid.”


34 posted on 05/06/2019 8:32:05 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

About .2% of the Boeing 737 Max fleet has crashed. These aren’t good odds. Would you get on a plane if I told you that the odds were 400:1 that the plane will go down with no survivors in the next six months?


35 posted on 05/06/2019 8:41:52 PM PDT by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cornfedcowboy

I wouldn’t hesitate to fly on a 737 MAX with a US based flight crew.


36 posted on 05/07/2019 1:21:52 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Facts are racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson