Posted on 05/16/2019 12:45:53 PM PDT by Steely Tom
HOFFMAN ESTATES, Ill. — Last month, a criminal case against a Hoffman Estates, Ill., woman became tied to the legal drama surrounding Jussie Smollett when a judge, saying the situation “smells, big time,” asked why the woman was being “treated differently” than the actor by Cook County prosecutors.
And now the woman has acquired a new attorney to help her fight the felony charge of disorderly conduct for allegedly filing a false police report, the same crime Smollett was accused of in a 16-count indictment before charges against him were suddenly dropped.
Candace Clark, 21, said she is happy that an attorney has stepped up to take her case pro bono, though she is sorry that she has created extra media buzz around Smollett.
“They’re trying to bring his (Smollett’s) case back up, and I’m sorry about that, Jussie,” Clark said Wednesday in an interview at her Hoffman Estates residence.
But her new attorney, William E. Conway, believes there is a double standard, echoing comments made last month by Circuit Court Judge Marc Martin.
“I want to emphasize that she doesn’t know anybody, she’s not connected,” said Conway, after he had filed an appearance Wednesday on behalf of Clark at the Cook County courthouse in Rolling Meadows. “We’re at this level of justice determined by whether someone is connected or not. Justice should be blind to that.”
Conway said he decided to enter the case after reading and seeing news reports in which Martin criticized prosecutors for handling Clark’s case differently from Smollett’s.
Smollett, the “Empire” television actor, was charged earlier this year with filing a phony police report in Chicago in which he said he was attacked and beaten by two men shouting racial epithets. His felony case was dismissed in exchange for performing two days of community service and forfeiting his $10,000 bail bond.
Clark was arrested in March and charged with felony disorderly conduct for allegedly filing a false report “regarding funds that went missing from her bank account,” according to court documents. She had no prior criminal background in Cook County, authorities said.
Prosecutors offered Clark deferred prosecution, meaning she would have to make restitution, obtain a GED and appear in District 9 Court at 26th Street and California Avenue in Chicago monthly or biweekly over a period of time. The charges would then be dismissed.
Conway, a former Cook County assistant state’s attorney who prosecuted financial crimes, said the deferred prosecution for a first-time offender seemed harsh.
“The deferred prosecution is far more onerous than what Smollett had to do,” Conway said.
It was at an April 11 preliminary hearing in Clark’s case that Martin first referenced Smollett’s case.
“I’d like to know why Ms. Clark is being treated differently than Jussie Smollett,” Martin asked prosecutors, according to a transcript of the proceedings. “It’s a disorderly conduct case (false) reporting — a lot less egregious than Mr. Smollett’s case. I have a problem with it. Why is she being treated differently?”
Prosecutors replied that cases were reviewed and charged based on the fact, the investigation and the position of the victims in this case, according to the transcript.
“Well, Ms. Clark is not a movie star, she doesn’t have a high-price lawyer, although, her lawyer is very good,” Martin said, referring to the public defender who at the time was representing Clark. “And this smells, big time. I didn’t create this mess, your office created this mess. And your explanation is unsatisfactory to this court. She’s being treated differently.”
He added: “So, we’re making her go to Branch 9, but Mr. Smollett walks free. I don’t get that. … I have a real problem with it. I know what Branch 9 is. It’s rigorous. I’ve issued enough warrants out of Branch 9 where people couldn’t comply and now they’re facing felony charges, no bond. It’s not right,” Martin said of the deferred prosecution plan.
Clark, who said she works the third shift at a Home Depot, has not been indicted on the charge yet, a formal step toward a trial or other disposition. In Wednesday’s hearing, Martin continued the case until June 6 to give Conway time to review the evidence.
“It’s surprising to me the difference between the way Smollett was treated and the way a third-shift worker at Home Depot is treated,” Conway said.
The city of Chicago is suing Smollett to recoup its expenses for the weekslong police investigation spurred by his report.
In other words she's screwed.
Is it a fabulous shoe?...................
Some Black Lives Matter more than others.
She doesnt know Kamala Harris and Cory Booker..who were BOTH involved in the initial hoax scheme..which is why Jussie refused to turn over his cell phone
No more 14th Amendment. No more equal protection, it’s all about different classes of farm animals.
There is a BIG difference. Smollett is Black and a Celebrity and a Leftist Activist and therefore Exempt.
It's FABULOUS!.................
It would appear that Ms. Clark doesn't understand this.
Not really. Not when the judge is fighting your case in court. 8>) Otherwise, you would be correct, and normally she would be screwed.
I am sure her attorney does.
The Smollett effect: When on jury duty, ALWAYS find for the plaintiff.
We no longer have a justice system. We have a Jussie system.
There is a BIG difference. Smollett is Black and a Celebrity and a Leftist Activist and therefore Exempt.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Plus, he is a fag, Jim.
LOL, She's apologizing to her get out of jail card named Jussie because she knows she's going to be tainting his good name, and the racial opportunists won't like that.
Because Juicy, he cute and gay.
Put him in jail like put a fat boy at a buffet.
Racist.
I just love this. Jusie has set a precedent.
Sounds like the Judge is giving the prosecutor one last chance to dismiss before he does?? Not only should the Judge dismiss the case, he should demand an Investigation into Malicious Prosecution by the Prosecutor, there appears to be Grounds and Precedent thanks to Juicy!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.