Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Disgusting......................but NOT SURPRISING................
1 posted on 05/23/2019 10:39:29 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: Red Badger

Huh? NPR? Don’t we pay fo.................. Oh.


2 posted on 05/23/2019 10:41:06 AM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Why am I subsidizing this?


3 posted on 05/23/2019 10:43:26 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Do you mean objections to the slaughter of innocent babies?

Those "reproductive rights"?

4 posted on 05/23/2019 10:44:06 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Smell the fear...


5 posted on 05/23/2019 10:45:56 AM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The memo: https://www.npr.org/sections/memmos/2019/05/15/723678750/guidance-reminder-on-abortion-procedures-terminology-rights


7 posted on 05/23/2019 10:55:07 AM PDT by Mr.Unique (The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

NPR?

Nancy Pelosi Radio?


8 posted on 05/23/2019 10:58:02 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

If we don’t say “baby killing” but instead use the term - rainbow expelling then people will better accept our infanticide values and rights.


10 posted on 05/23/2019 10:59:56 AM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Anyone funding NPR is funding an organization that believes:

The term “unborn” implies that there is a baby inside a pregnant woman, not a fetus. Babies are not babies until they are born. They're fetuses. Incorrectly calling a fetus a “baby” or “the unborn” is part of the strategy used by antiabortion groups to shift language/legality/public opinion.

They also believe that jamming a knife into a baby's head, then sucking her brain out with a vacuum is “reproductive health care.”

11 posted on 05/23/2019 11:00:02 AM PDT by Mr.Unique (The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Using fetus instead of unborn, even though fetus literally means unborn. This is a epic fail that will not have the desired effect.


12 posted on 05/23/2019 11:00:13 AM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
...the injunction against the word “unborn,” which journalists are to avoid like the plague, according to Memmott, because it “implies that there is a baby inside a pregnant woman.”

Whoa, he has us there. I'll have to admit that I was under the impression that that's where babies come from. Glad to be shown the error of my ways.

13 posted on 05/23/2019 11:00:25 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
“They’re fetuses,” he lectured. “Incorrectly calling a fetus a ‘baby’ or ‘the unborn’ is part of the strategy used by antiabortion groups to shift language/legality/public opinion.”

“Fetus” is Latin for baby.

14 posted on 05/23/2019 11:03:43 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

So the NPR portion of the swamp is still full.


15 posted on 05/23/2019 11:03:45 AM PDT by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The style guide makes one thing abundantly, painstakingly clear: NPR writers are to go out of their way to make sure it never, ever sounds like the collection of cells inside a mother’s womb is a human life.

~~~

Except that someone who kills a pregnant woman is usually charged with double homicide, and I think you would find that most people on the left or right, include those at NPR, would agree with the charges.

hmmm...


16 posted on 05/23/2019 11:05:07 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

We are for the rights of the unborn.

This is the language we can use to counter their demonic euphemisms.


17 posted on 05/23/2019 11:05:26 AM PDT by FranklinsTower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I wonder if we could get away with saying that abortion kills transgender babies.


18 posted on 05/23/2019 11:10:14 AM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I guess that NPR doesn’t think that their writers are sharp enough to pull that off on their own.

So why on earth are WE still providing NPR with OUR Tax dollars?


19 posted on 05/23/2019 11:12:48 AM PDT by Howie66 ("...Against All Enemies, Foreign and Democrat.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

If the aren’t unborn are they undead?


21 posted on 05/23/2019 11:18:54 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

23 posted on 05/23/2019 11:21:37 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a Simple Manner for a Happy Life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Evil.

No other word for it.


24 posted on 05/23/2019 11:26:07 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

This pro-abort strategy parallels the LGBT agenda WRT to sex indoctrination in the schools.
The LGBT training manuals explicitly state that their goal is to break the connection between sex and baby-making, and to focus instead on sexuality, feelings, and the “varieties of sexual expression and sexual identity.”


26 posted on 05/23/2019 11:44:40 AM PDT by mumblypeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson