[txrefugee]

Is this coming from the Obama FBI phone tapes of Trump and his associates?

[shalom aleichem]

Yawn. Jackals gotta jackal.

[norwaypinesavage]

Sounds to me like another exoneration of Trump. His lawyer obviously knew of no criminal activity.

[dangus]

If Trump or Dowd indicated that as a result of Flynn refusing to give them a heads up, that Trump regarded Flynn as hostile AND it was improper to give such a heads up, there would seem to be a case for obstructing justice. Mueller alleges that. So why is THIS the part of the conversation we got? Where’s the part that vindicates or condemns Trump?

[JonPreston]

Arrest someone, anyone!!’

[mass55th]

Obviously this was shared with Mueller at some point since Flynn was cooperating with Mueller since July of 2017. This phone call is from November 2017.

[adorno]

There is a MAJOR clear FACT regarding the Mueller investigation into the Trump/Russia collusion fantasy.

That FACT is that, Mueller knew, almost from the start, or at the very start, that there was no collusion to investigate, since the fusionGPS dossier was a complete fake, paid for by the Hillary campaign and the DNC and helped along by the Obama administration.

So, another MAJOR fact to come out of the ‘investigation’ is that, Mueller proceeded with a sham investigation, with the sole intent of getting Trump on something, and failing to get him on collusion, Mueller and his team set about getting Trump on obstruction of justice via perjury, or lying to the FBI.

What the democrats have ended up with is three major defeats or setbacks in the last 2 1/2 years. First they lost the election in 2016. Secondly, the economy is booming as never before. Thirdly, Mueller came up empty.

One could say that democrats are headed towards 2 other major disappointments, those being a huge Trump election with in 2020, and the loss of the house by democrats.

They keep digging their graves deeper and deeper.

[JoSixChip]

Mueller's report said. "When Flynn’s counsel reiterated that Flynn could no longer share information pursuant to a joint defense agreement, the President’s personal counsel said he would make sure that the President knew that Flynn’s actions reflected 'hostility' towards the President.'"

Well crap, that does not look good.

[piasa]

same day as the mesage was left for Flynn’s lawyer :

NOVEMBER 22, 2017 : (AG SESSIONS WRITES LETTER DIRECTING THE DOJ TO REVISIT THE URANIUM ONE PROBE OF HILLARY CLINTON [DOES IT ALSO REFER TO HER NONGOVSERVER?] ; IT IS EMAILED TO HUBER BY SESSION’S CHIEF OF STAFF MATTHEW WHITAKER)
******
>>> See MARCH 2019 : (AFTER A DOJ LAWYER LAST YEAR CLAIMED [FALSELY] THAT NO SUCH DOCUMENT EXISTS, THE DOJ FINDS LONG-LOST NOV 22, 2017 LETTER BY AG JEFF SESSIONS, WHICH WAS EMAILED TO HUBER BY SESSION’S CHIEF OF STAFF MATTHEW WHITAKER; THE LETTER DIRECTS THE DOJ TO REVISIT THE URANIUM ONE PROBE OF HILLARY CLINTON [DOES IT ALSO REFER TO HER NONGOVSERVER?]) After it claimed no such document existed, the Justice Department just unearthed a letter Matt Whitaker delivered to the Utah U.S. attorney directing a review of how the department handled the Clinton Foundation and the Uranium One issues.
Then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions wrote the letter on Nov. 22, 2017 for Utah U.S. Attorney John Huber. Matt Whitaker, who was Sessions’ chief of staff at the time, emailed the letter to Huber that day, writing, “As we discussed.” He also sent Huber a copy of a letter the Justice Department’s Congressional affairs chief sent to the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee on Nov. 13 of that year.
The existence of a letter documenting Sessions’ directive that the DOJ revisit probes of Trump’s top political foe is a surprise because a department lawyer said in court last year that senior officials insisted it didn’t exist. The liberal nonprofit American Oversight obtained the letter through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request they filed on Nov. 22, 2017––the same day Whitaker emailed Sessions’ letter to Huber.....
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...-— It Exists: DOJ Finds Letter Ordering Scrutiny of Uranium One, Hillary Clinton, daily beast ^ | 3/9/2019 | Betsy Woodruff , Posted on ?3?/?9?/?2019? ?10?:?17?:?55? ?PM by Aquamarine

[trebb]

IOW - Trump’s lawyer wasn’t aware of any dirt but was concerned that Flynn might make a deal and say some bad things that could cause problems even if later turning out to not be true...and after 2 years and tens of millions, nothing was turned up so this message has zero relevance to reality.

[ballplayer]

More like Flynn is Told his son will be prosecuted for something if he doesn’t plead guilty.