I take it you disagree with the book but are unable to reply to anything it says. Maybe your children could.
To speak to your point I can tell you something you seem not to know - children who learn creation science know far more about evolution theory than evolution trained children. Learning all theories seems to bring that out. So if a job required knowledge of evolution theory (or global warming theories for that matter) the creation trained children would most likely excel.
To speak to your point I can tell you something you seem not to know - children who learn creation science know far more about evolution theory than evolution trained children. Learning all theories seems to bring that out. So if a job required knowledge of evolution theory (or global warming theories for that matter) the creation trained children would most likely excel. Somewhat poor analogy.
What if a group of children were taught that books were evil, that paperbacks were of the devil, softbacks would lead one to perdition, hard-bound books were the gateway to hell. Such children would be drilled in their hatred and fear of books, and trained to recognize at a glance a pocketbook, to differentiate between a folio and a palimpsest, etc.
Such children would end up knowing a lot more about books that an average child - but would they be more-capable of working at a job requiring a knowledge of books, e.g., as librarians, booksellers, or book-restaurers?
Regards,