To: my3centseuro
Why does video of them REMOVING the mines constitute a smoking gun? Perhaps they were trying to ‘defuse’ an international situation.
4 posted on
06/14/2019 1:42:24 PM PDT by
ichabod1
(He's a vindictive SOB but he's *our* vindictive SOB.)
To: ichabod1
“Why does video of them REMOVING the mines constitute a smoking gun? Perhaps they were trying to ‘defuse’ an international situation.”
Careful, if you get too logical, some readers heads might explode
15 posted on
06/14/2019 1:55:17 PM PDT by
rintintin
(q)
To: ichabod1
If they were saving the ship by removing mines planted by someone else:
- Why deny doing that?
- Why not produce the mines as evidence of whos mines they are?"
44 posted on
06/14/2019 3:39:56 PM PDT by
pepsi_junkie
(Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
To: ichabod1
Yeah - and there’s a few bridges up for sale...you should look into them....best price for you....
51 posted on
06/15/2019 4:09:26 AM PDT by
trebb
(Don't howl about illegal leeches while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson