Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Republicans threaten second walkout
Corvallis Gazette-Times ^ | June 18, 2019 | Aubrey Wieber, Claire Withycombe & Mark Miller

Posted on 06/19/2019 5:53:47 AM PDT by Twotone

Senate Republicans are considering staging a second walkout — potentially delaying the end of the legislative session — to block a vote on sweeping climate legislation.

House Bill 2020, which would implement a carbon pricing program, passed the House on Monday night after a floor debate that stretched past six hours.

All Republicans and two Democrats voted against it. Republicans have always been strongly against it, saying it would hurt industry and rural Oregonians.

Senate Republicans have already shown they have an appetite to do more than just drag out a floor debate by a few hours.

On May 7, they staged a walkout to deny a quorum — the Senate must have 20 members present to conduct its work — so the Senate could not take up a business tax proposal.

The walkout lasted four days, and they eventually came back after Gov. Kate Brown struck a deal to kill two controversial bills: one that more strictly enforced vaccine regulations and a gun control bill.

(Excerpt) Read more at gazettetimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: carbontax; climatechange; oregon; senate; walkout
Tactics that work for the Dems certainly work for Republicans.
1 posted on 06/19/2019 5:53:47 AM PDT by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Twotone

I had forgotten about this.


2 posted on 06/19/2019 5:56:10 AM PDT by momincombatboots (Do you know anyone who isnÂ’t a socialist after 65? Freedom exchanged for cash and control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Good.


3 posted on 06/19/2019 5:59:33 AM PDT by goodnesswins (White Privilege EQUALS Self Control & working 50-80 hrs/wk for 40 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Oregon perhaps to be included in the climate change brought on by the big quake


4 posted on 06/19/2019 6:17:23 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

This time, the Republicans should leave the state so that the Rat governor can’t send the state police after them.


5 posted on 06/19/2019 6:24:57 AM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ~you/base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

“to block a vote on sweeping climate legislation.”

Shouldn’t this be labeled as “controversial climate legislation”? Or is it only Republicans proposals that are controversial?


6 posted on 06/19/2019 6:32:52 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Why? Trump will veto


7 posted on 06/19/2019 6:43:40 AM PDT by Pollard (If you don't understand what I typed, you haven't read the classics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

Your comment is spot on. Witness Hope Hicks being grilled again today.
Feed the socialists their own medicine. No quorum!


8 posted on 06/19/2019 6:48:35 AM PDT by sanjuanbob (“Power to the people”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollard

It’s a state bill in Oregon.

I thought it was federal at first, too.


9 posted on 06/19/2019 6:49:20 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (President Trump IS The Resistance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

You try to tell them that playing nice with these radicals isn’t going to work.
Now they have radicals running Portland with an army of Antifa and BLM to break heads.


10 posted on 06/19/2019 6:49:33 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aquila48
No. It is "sweeping" when the media party proposes it.

It is only "controversial" if the media party opposes it.

Got it? Next question like that, it will be off to the Gulag for you!

11 posted on 06/19/2019 6:51:34 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys all aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

Shouldn’t this be labeled as “controversial climate legislation”? Or is it only Republicans proposals that are controversial?

*************

Nothing the Left wants is ever labelled as controversial or radical. There is a presumption in the media that everything the Left proposes is altruistic, noble, cost-free and beneficent.

In short, the Left’s motivations are never questioned.


12 posted on 06/19/2019 7:24:04 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pollard

He will? I don’t think he will even get the chance since it’s up to Kate brown.


13 posted on 06/19/2019 7:48:37 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson