Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/23/2019 4:19:35 PM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: John W

You think he might have lived longer without the surgery? Most likely.


2 posted on 07/23/2019 4:23:42 PM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

“paid the family $6 million to settle the matter privately”

And they accepted? Sounds like that’s that.


3 posted on 07/23/2019 4:25:46 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

He might have been better off having aliens probe him.....


4 posted on 07/23/2019 4:28:19 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

Why settle for Mercy Hospital when the Cleveland Clinic is in its backyard?


6 posted on 07/23/2019 4:40:50 PM PDT by lightman (Byzantine Troparia: The "praise choruses" of antiquity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

Well, a good number of people do die after heart surgery, and being 82 years old doesn’t help. Also, as far as I know, he didn’t have any connection to Hillary, so that typical cause of usual demise is not a factor.

Probably just crappy medical care, at most, coupled with age.


7 posted on 07/23/2019 4:46:04 PM PDT by BobL (I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart - I just don't tell anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

A blackmail that would make Creepy Porn Lawyer Proud.


8 posted on 07/23/2019 4:47:13 PM PDT by KevinB ("Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." - Charles Darwin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

Look at what lights a fire under NYT butt.

Something that the Armstrong family might not want to see in a newspaper.

New York Times is fearless, isn’t it.


11 posted on 07/23/2019 5:04:29 PM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

Mercy Health killed humankind’s first extra world explorer.

They killed the firsy man on the moon.

Put that on a tee shirt.

Only beaten by NASA losing the tapes of the first steps on the moon. Forevermore.

LMAO


18 posted on 07/23/2019 5:51:32 PM PDT by TheNext (Diversity: Darker Replaces Lighter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

Never treat a celebrity on Medicare. The risk benefit ratio is too high.

I’m not sure if he was on Medicare, but he probably was. If he was a regular Joe, there probably wouldn’t be a lawsuit or big settlement here for an 82 year old.


22 posted on 07/23/2019 6:07:55 PM PDT by grumpygresh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

Pay wall.

Someone getting a kickback?


25 posted on 07/23/2019 8:01:59 PM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

The merciless sisters of St. Louis strike again.

It isn’t about money. It is ALL about MONEY with them.

I hope I can die at home.


26 posted on 07/23/2019 8:24:10 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (We are governed by the consent of the governed and we are fools for allowing it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
look folks, there are medical treatments that have many side effects or poor outcomes....from what I read, treatment didn't go well but it was not that it was the wrong treatment, or bad treatment, it just failed....

notice that the wife did not push this lawsuit nor asked for it, she was forced to sign off on it or loose her executor ship....

notice that the dil was the lawyer........

the hospital merely settled because they didn't want to have the national bruhaha over the death at their hospital of a national figure.....

PEOPLE SHOULD NOT DIEJUST BECAUSE THEY'RE 82 WITH SIGNIFICANT CARDIAC DISEASE which is poppycock....

30 posted on 07/24/2019 11:54:52 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
even one expert retained by the hospital would find serious problems with his treatment.

I find that statement questionable. No legal defense team is going hire a potential hostile expert to be an expert witness on their defense.

As a side note, my brother-in-law was a highly respected Oncologist (now retired) here in S.E. Michigan who was approached by the sleeze bag Geoffrey Fieger law firm back in the 1990's to become a member of his medical "expert witness" group that would be called on anytime Fieger was pursuing a medical malpractice lawsuit........My BIL turned him down.

But there were many occasions where he was called on to give expert testimony on behalf of legal defense teams.......

It's a racket, you have crapbag lawywers -Fieger- and their crapbag doctors who will say anything in an attempt to win the case for their crapbag employer/lawyer.......

33 posted on 07/24/2019 12:21:30 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (I'm in the cleaning business.......I launder money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson