>
Regarding this case, the ruling held the 14th amendment compelled the action. Here is an interesting take on the constitutionality of the 14th Amendment.
>
Along the same lines as the 13th as insofar, it was passed via compulsion/extortion: Want to remove the occupying army & be welcomed back into the Union...just sign on this dotted line.
Not as if the 16th doesn’t violate ala (economic) slavery (by degree(s)\tier(s))
The 16th itself vs. 4th & 5th (one MUST sign-away their 5th A. Rights to even file, IIRC), let alone IRS can lien\freeze all assets w/o a trial)
You know, ‘back in the day’, when we were still a Constitutional Republic, not this Banana.
See tagline.