I hope she doesn’t leave California.
California is going to have to purge it’s self.
The “wall” needs to be built on the southern, eastern and northern boundaries of Ca. Then the San Andreas Fault needs to be triggered!!!
Yes, Concerning the 50 Conservatives remaining in Ca., we will send in evacs first.
Boo Hoo.
I could tell by her comments that she is a good lefty and has never voted for anyone but a Rat.
Do I feel sorry for her? Not in the least. I simply hope that she stays in CA and doesn’t come here to vote in the same crap she voted for there. She has no clue she is getting just what she voted for.
Democrats should be legally banned from leaving the crap holes they voted for. Because they will vote for the same thing wherever they go. They are like primitive people who strip an area bare and then move on to do the same thing in a new place.
I realize the reverse condemnation law was intended on sticking utilities with massive liability for lawsuits, but the federal recognition of this vast blame shifting from those who refuse to maintain proper tree & brush clearance gets me wondering; why couldn’t the same law be used against cities, counties and courts?
The unlawful granting of public property to private individuals to use (and abuse) as they please causes direct harm to the citizens who have to put up with the piles of junk, drug paraphernalia and feces. It locks private citizens out of enjoying rivers and waterways as homeless encampments ‘claim’ it as their property, and insane court decisions back up those claims forbidding the enforcement of basic ideals like ‘no trespassing’, no squatting, no illegal camping, etc.
I’d love to see a series of lawsuits utilizing the reverse condemnation, the drug house confiscation, and 5th takings without compensation slapped against the local, state and federal governments. As the courts have repeatedly ruled, we can not force government to enforce their laws, but as they’ve made tools to punish public and private companies with the most scant relation to the damage, why not use those tools to reclaim our parks & streets?
Let’s cut the BS. Every American city,let alone most liberal run jurisdictions are complete sh*tholes. What are going to do about it? The answer is nothing.
This Bay Area conservative is going to vamoose next June. Good riddance.
Recycled news
Yes, I wonder.
She'd have more of an impact hiring a carload of young studs to curb-stomp some sense into Grabbin' Nuisance...
Well, California legalized dope. Build the wall around California and around the other western states that it has already bled into. As for the Midwest, it will swallow everyone who enters into its culture or prisons. ;-)
I’m having to put up with this quasi-third-World country wanna-be state for just nine eight more days then I’m outta here for good!
My Lady and I are getting the hell out of the Leftist-created Hell hole of California and specifically Sacramento on August 31st heading for Saint George, Utah, and our new home there. We are selling all our California holdings and knocking the feces laden dust of our feet and getting out before the progressives lock the prison gates to keep us productive people captive to pay the bills.
The latest insanity from the inmates running the California Asylum is from inSane Francisco where the Board of Stupidvisors passed an ordinance Tuesday night prohibiting anyone from referring to any person convicted of a crime as “ex-con,” “convicts,” “felons,” “prisoner,” “parolee,” “convicted felon,” or any term referencing their status in relation to their crimes. In fact, anyone from the moment of police detainment, through arrest, confinement, convictions, adjudication, sentence, parole, or having been released after serving time is now to be referred to as a “justice involved person,” with no mention of the crime, level of crime, disposition, conviction, release, or anything that might cause embarrassment or discrimination to the “justice involved person.” It’s as if, through no fault of their own, the innocent person is just a victim of circumstances, swept up in the bureaucratic machine of “justice involvement.”
Should victims of these “justice involved persons”, regardless if they were robbed at gun point, raped, beaten, or even murdered, now be euphemistically and generically be referred to as a “crime involved person?”
Which brings up the question of how does one then identify “justice involved persons” who may not purchase firearms, associate with other “justice involved persons” who have not yet completed their involvement, or more importantly rent housing within 1000 feet of an educational institution where age challenged individuals may or may not be pedagogically instructed, or even determine if a specific “justice involved person” can be hired to work with such age challenged individuals? (I’m trying to be politically correct ala California style so as to not offend any persons [how do they get away with using “person” when it contains a reference to a gendered male {gasp} offspring? I’m shocked!].)
This non-justice involved person would really like to know how they are going to do these things. . . but in ten days upon arrival in Utah, will no longer give a damn what California is doing to itself except then as a spectator sport on a Grand Guignol Tragic Comedy.
ehh 10 to 1 she votes democrat. Wallow in your filth, you grew it.
The problem is DRUG ADDICTS.
By refusing to even define the problem, the cities of Portland, San Francisco, LA, Sacramento, Seattle, and the rest can whine and talk about "compassion for the homeless" while they put their hands out and ask for more money to "combat homelessness."
The problem is DRUGS - something liberals are LEGALIZING and encouraging now in many states and cities.
