Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: miss marmelstein; patro; abb; SE Mom; HarleyLady27; connyankee; Behind Liberal Lines; ...
What does it say about the judgment of several of the Democrat prez contenders that, without waiting to get the facts, they immediately jumped on the NY Times story to demand Kavanaugh’s impeachment? And now it turns out the accuser doesn’t remember the supposed incident.
Ping to Liberal Media Criticism list.
2 posted on
09/16/2019 9:04:37 AM PDT by
governsleastgovernsbest
(FReep mail me to be added to my Liberal Media Criticism ping list.)
To: All
If she doesn’t recall the incident, there was no incident. Period.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
When even your own propagandists see how bad the propaganda has become...
4 posted on
09/16/2019 9:05:22 AM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with islamic terrorists - they want to die for allah and we want to kill them.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Another episode of Morning Joe Mika and Joe's Campaign Advice to Dems.
5 posted on
09/16/2019 9:05:36 AM PDT by
Sans-Culotte
(If it weren't for fake hate crimes, there would be no hate crimes at all.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Good for Joe. Didn’t he go against Mon a last week for something. Can’t remember what it was.
6 posted on
09/16/2019 9:05:40 AM PDT by
gcparent
(Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
[ Morning Joe Rips ‘Glaring Omission’ in NYT Kavanaugh Story, Warns Dems It May Backfire ]
WOW - if the Democrats have lost “Morning Joe” then you know their lies are not only just bad, but incredibly-bad.
7 posted on
09/16/2019 9:08:56 AM PDT by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
NYT - “ We don’t have to make no stinkin’ apologies”
8 posted on
09/16/2019 9:09:56 AM PDT by
nuconvert
( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
It already has backfired.
11 posted on
09/16/2019 9:14:27 AM PDT by
DarthVader
(Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the day be decided but by Blood & Iron)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
... rip the New York Times for its "glaring omission" in failing to include in the original version of its article about a new accusation against Brett Kavanaugh the fact that the alleged victim doesn't want to speak and that friends say doesn't recall the incident. ... You're right - Joe's probably more concerned about the backlash than 'journalistic' ethics... but it's still surprising he noticed. That's a pretty compromised man...
12 posted on
09/16/2019 9:15:09 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(I saw a movie about governments and weaponless people - it was called Schindler's List.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
If the only push back is that it destroys the (ineffective, dying) candidacy of Julian de LaRaza, errr, Castro, then it’ll all have been worth it. Just to get the slimy little Communist dweeb off of the airwaves.
13 posted on
09/16/2019 9:17:03 AM PDT by
Ancesthntr
("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Lol. As if “Progressives” ever have consequences
They’re like spoiled children.
19 posted on
09/16/2019 9:21:28 AM PDT by
griswold3
(Democratic Socialism is Slavery by Mob Rule!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Hey! Moaning Joke. We’ve passed “may” and moved on to “DID” (backfire). The leftist scumbags at the Slimes need to have their butts sued.
20 posted on
09/16/2019 9:21:53 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(You can vote your way into socialism but you have to shoot your way out of it.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
21 posted on
09/16/2019 9:22:03 AM PDT by
samtheman
(The drive-by media is the true boss of the democommie party.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Is joe growing a backbone? Last week he stopped mika about that stuff about Barron not being trumps son.
22 posted on
09/16/2019 9:22:10 AM PDT by
gcparent
(Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Eh, close but no cigar Morning Joe:
"I don’t understand why they didn’t put this information in the article."
Really, Joe? You truly "don't understand" why they would omit a critical fact that undermines their smear against Kavanaugh?
Gosh, maybe their word processing software had a glitch, or maybe they just "forgot" about what was in their own book. Couldn't possibly be that they were perfectly okay with distorting the facts because the NYT has an anti-Trump bias....
Could it?
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Boogity-boogity-boogity. Make enough loud noises and scary faces, and maybe Brett Kavanaugh will be intimidated into abandoning a lifetime of reasoned approach and deliberate consideration of the matters before him on the bench.
This has the secondary objective of so thoroughly discouraging any potential replacement for RBG, that nobody will be offered up except an ultra-left activist revisionist toadie.
The Democrats are just going to have to win the 2020 Presidential election.
Yeah, right. To all three points.
25 posted on
09/16/2019 9:32:36 AM PDT by
alloysteel
(Nowhere in the Universe is there escape from the consequences of the crime of stupidity.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
All of the story is somehow not ...
... Fit to print.
26 posted on
09/16/2019 9:36:56 AM PDT by
Seaplaner
(Never give in-never, never,never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. Winston Churchill)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
The Times knew what it was doing and it has had the desired effect. JoMika is just part of the smokescreen.
27 posted on
09/16/2019 9:41:13 AM PDT by
clintonh8r
(Truth is hate speech to those who hate the truth.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I’m just so surprised that candidates are making conclusions here that are impossible to make. Again! Indeed. Why is he surprised? The Democrats have been doing this for years, particularly in regards to President Trump. Always recall that the same Democrats promised to impeach Donald Trump before he took the Office of the President. Literally the next day after he was elected they started. The only reason they didn't promise to impeach him even before he was elected was because they did not believe he was going to get elected.
And Joe is surprised that they're doing this now? I don't think he is surprised, rather he is scared they've gone completely around the bend so far that even some of the moronic Democrat voters will notice it.
28 posted on
09/16/2019 9:43:09 AM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I’ve never watched this show - but as I recall reading, these two are having sex, right?
29 posted on
09/16/2019 9:45:14 AM PDT by
PGR88
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
