Posted on 10/08/2019 12:38:18 PM PDT by janetjanet998
The intelligence community inspector general testified Friday that the so-called “whistleblower” who mischaracterized President Donald Trump’s call with the leader of Ukraine had a previous “professional relationship” with a 2020 Democrat candidate, according to the Washington Examiner.
“The IG said [the whistleblower] worked or had some type of professional relationship with one of the Democratic candidates,” one person with knowledge of inspector general Michael Atkinson’s testimony told the Examiner’s Byron York.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
You can’t investigate democrats overseas but apparently you can be a fake whistle blower against the president of the United States and cause an impeachment on behalf of one of the Democrat candidates. Put these damn bums in jail where they belong.
Hey now, you don't know if she got paid.
This is why they are trying to get a second one to come forward or I should say to hide in the shadows like the 1st one.
Especially if found out to be the ICIG ( Intelligence Investigator General)
You know, the guy in charge of Intelligence ethics and enforcement.
“professional relationship”
hmmm sounds like one of them was a prostitute.. if he worked for Warren, it would indicate bias with a motive, knock down Trump knock out Biden...credible?
I've been calling her "Willie's chew toy," but I like yours better.
There’s professional and then there’s professional.
“Mole hunt”
I’m sorry I don’t know how to make this hot. But the article exposes a whole lot of democrat’s Ukraine connections. And a few Republicans.
I keep thinking Warren, because she stood the most to gain.
Mayor Pete’s deep state, side squeeze, butt-boy?
Stripper? Prostitute?
Sure why not impeach the president and remove him from office on secret evidence? What could go wrong?
Plays the skin flute in E flat
Most of America’s real enemies have offices in the Capitol Building...
The IC IG has a whole lot ‘spainin to do regarding why he green lighted this obviously partisan conspiracy against
President Trump. Strangely, Graham invited Rudy to testify today and not the compromised IC IG.
He/she should be forced to publicly testify & be identified. You make this charge, you should have enough round ones to say it under oath in a public setting, or it doesn’t count
I don’t think the person actually exists. Theya re a John/Jane Doe on a memo written by lawyers.
I heard the Box that said they did not discuss this w/ anyone prior to the IG notification, which is not true and therefore invalidates the whole document.
This 2nd/3rd hand account of the phone call was ‘coached’ to say the least and therefore invalid, unless you are a Dem kangaroo court.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.