Posted on 11/19/2019 7:42:07 PM PST by Its All Over Except ...
vinman himself, and that woman- can’t remember their names- also undercut the false claims if quid pro quo AND bribery- admitting on live television that nope- there wasn’t any!
LOL. Thanks. Hope so.
Here is the real news of today:
Three times Vindman was approached about being Ukraine Defense Minister.
Let that sink in.
That’s like Trump offering to make Prince Harry our Secretary of Defense!
Further, no way would Ukraine have made the offer if he was not encouraging it. This is the definition of “c0nflicted”.
THAT is clever.
Windman said the release of info about the call was to a cleared person with a "need to know". More than likely, no laws broken. The deep state has a free reign in that regard.
Yep you are right. If Trump offers a meeting, that's bribery. If he doesn't, that's bribery. If he holds the meeting, that's bribery. If he doesn't hold a meeting that's bribery.
Not so sure about that because in closed testimony Repubs tried to cross examine Vindman but Schifty shut them down which these Repubs later related on TV occurred.
quid? bribery? cover up? WTH? Could it be that schiff-4-brains is a lying SOS? Why yes, I believe that is so.
Yovanovitch.
And she may have lied under oath as her testimony previously did not line up with emails of hers to a Democrat staffer.
Everything here on this thread about all the witnesses is how you destroy their credibility and win.
Is QPQ listed right there next to collusion as a NON CRIME!?
There well may have been an illegal leak of classified somewhere along the line. That's why Nunes asked that question several times to several witnesses. But Windman's answer is pretty straightforward, the deep state old boy network can share classified dirt with each other. That's how it works, at least until we finally kill off the deep state.
Seems legit
If I were Nunes or one of the other Repubs I would ask why he should be believed given the following’
Morrison destroyed Vindman by stating Vindman had poor judgment, was most likely a leaker, did not keep his bosses in the loop, went behind his bosses backs, became angry he was cut out of working on Ukraine.
If you destroy the witnesses credibility Trump wins by default.
Nunes has more brains then all the liberals in America combined.
Same at CNN. Comments are a complete 180 from reality.
People need to realize the media, at least what I have seen today, if pumping out a different interpretation of everything. It’s not as simple as just dismissing it as fake news. People will end up frustrated many times over when this is done.
<< “ Nunes...” >>
......
Yes, isn’t he wonderful, easy to follow and coherent. A gentleman, and determined to issue a Fact based chronology of Schif for Brains fencing in All defense of POTUS.
I’m now wondering if the Democrats can even reach an Impeachment, which has been a Foregone Conclusion! They have the Votes.
Can they get them?
The kind of folks that hear “voices”, a mentally unstable lot.
I don’t have the time or stomach to watch this, except for the highlights. Are Republicans given the same amount of time to question the witnesses as Democrats?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.