Above post is nonsense because Durham was NOT commenting about HIS investigation, he was commenting on the IG report and making a general statement that there are inaccuracies in IG's conclusions. That in no way exposes any pertinent facts of Durham's investigation. I am not aware of any law which prohibits commenting on an ongoing investigation. It is actually a ruse used by non-scrupulous bureaucrats to avoid answering questions. The poster's intent in posting this comment is therefore intended to cause division among Freepers.
They make it up because they know their base supporters do not check things and just run with what they have been fed.
“What the heck is Durham doing?”
I get a kick out of all these armchair prosecutors ... like Durham doesn’t know what he is doing. His statement was a load shot across the bow and perfectly legal.