Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump considering skipping general election debates in 2020: report
The Hill ^ | 12 12 2019 | Marty Johnson

Posted on 12/12/2019 5:24:59 PM PST by yesthatjallen

President Trump has been discussing with his campaign advisers whether or not to participate in the general election debates in 2020, two people close to the situation told The New York Times.

According to the sources, Trump doesn't trust the Commission on Presidential Debates, the nonprofit organization that puts on the debates. Specifically, Trump is apprehensive of who will be chosen by the organization to moderate the debates, the Times reports.

Trump's campaign reportedly declined to comment on what their plan was for the debates at a state-of-the-race campaign briefing in Arlington, Va.

During the 2016 campaign, the president persistently complained about his debates with former Secretary of State Hilary Clinton, claiming that he was put at a disadvantage.

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2020; debates; fakenews; gettrump; leftistbias; riggedgame; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last
To: Gahanna Bob

If FOX got a debate it would be Pissy Wallace, bet on it.


21 posted on 12/12/2019 5:35:46 PM PST by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

OTOH it’d be fun to see Creepy Joe fumble and Cankles flubbering all over the place about global warming and islamophobia and open borders, etc.


22 posted on 12/12/2019 5:36:03 PM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

“two people close to the situation told The New York Times”

right. because The Slimes would be the first place a Trump campaign honcho who was really in-the-know would leak too ...

all anonymously sourced rumors should be considered fabricated “news” if/until a named official goes on the record ...


23 posted on 12/12/2019 5:36:59 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Just hold rallies. Don’t give these commies a forum.


24 posted on 12/12/2019 5:37:22 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

If Hillary ends up the nominee, just re-run the 2016 debates. Follow up with promises kept.


25 posted on 12/12/2019 5:37:36 PM PST by CedarDave (Public schools are better named "propaganda indoctrination centers." Educate your children at home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I don’t know. It depends on the nominee. I think the more people who see Warren the more people won’t like her.


26 posted on 12/12/2019 5:38:20 PM PST by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Well they gave the witch the questions last time even though they thought she had it in the bag who knows what they will do this time.


27 posted on 12/12/2019 5:38:52 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

“Sounds like a negotiating tactic. POUTS is just throwing jabs at Fake News.”

Yup, floating trial balloons and punking the media at the same time.


28 posted on 12/12/2019 5:39:49 PM PST by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Whether he does or not it’s a good idea to make the media wonder.


29 posted on 12/12/2019 5:40:32 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

This is brand new territory! The dims are HORRIBLE in brand new territory! They’ll make mistakes, since they are checker players on the POTUS chess board. This is innovative! This is genius!


30 posted on 12/12/2019 5:41:07 PM PST by LittleBillyInfidel (This tagline has been formatted to fit the screen. Some content has been edited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Good idea? Bad idea? <<

Great idea!...lol..the Dems could beat up on eachother and the moderator could pick the winner by the softball or hardball questions they asked of each...

are Rachel Madcow and Jim Acosta available as Mods??..they both are known as honest and hard hitting journalists...should be fun to watch..Id tune in....../s,

31 posted on 12/12/2019 5:41:24 PM PST by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinB

I like your thoughts on this.


32 posted on 12/12/2019 5:41:29 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

Also remember, that Twitter may block his tweets.

This is a NEGOTIATING POSITION. The networks are scheming to sandbag trump with biased moderators and debate setup.

So threaten to skip them. Doesn’t mean he will.
Just gives better cards in his hand to negotiate.


33 posted on 12/12/2019 5:41:41 PM PST by Dacula (Epstein did not kill himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CMailBag
If FOX got a debate it would be Pissy Wallace, bet on it.

I hate that guy. Pretends to be hard-hitting on both sides, but soft-pedals it for Democrats while he attacks President Trump (and unnecessarily so). Wallace is a jerk doing the Democrats bidding.

34 posted on 12/12/2019 5:42:22 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I think he should hold a rally every time a debate is scheduled!


35 posted on 12/12/2019 5:42:47 PM PST by smvoice (I WILL NOT WEAR THE RIBBON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Early negotiating position on who will run the debates.


36 posted on 12/12/2019 5:44:41 PM PST by tinyowl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nothingburger

Good idea at this point, because I wouldn’t even trust Fox to host a debate, given that Donna Brazille likely would tip off the RAT nominee as to the questions.


37 posted on 12/12/2019 5:45:05 PM PST by edie1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
The Republicans can supply a cardboard cutout of President Trump, with a message on it stating "I made America great again, deal with it!". He doesn't need to be on stage in person.
38 posted on 12/12/2019 5:45:31 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Has any other incumbent president done this?
It would certainly be a shock for many, though I get why he may not consider ‘debates’ necessary.
We rarely allow the candidates to have a full on, honest debate these days. The moderators will often spoon feed certain remarks or responses to their favored candidate.
Those same moderators will experience ‘spontaneous deafness’
when the opposing candidate scores a few points.


39 posted on 12/12/2019 5:47:42 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

As some have stated, this is probably a negotiating tactic by Trump. The media and the DEMs need to have Trump debate far more than Trump does. Watch the left suggest FIVE debates. If Trump is actually thinking about skipping the presidential debates, I wouldn’t blame him one bit.


40 posted on 12/12/2019 5:48:00 PM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson