To: White MAGA Man
That makes absolutely no sense.
To: Sacajaweau
Sure it does. It makes sense when you compare it to Nancy’s, “we have to pass the bill to see what’s in it” statement.
35 posted on
12/15/2019 7:28:48 PM PST by
liberalh8ter
(The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
To: Sacajaweau
“That makes absolutely no sense.”
Of course it does. Allow me to restate:
’Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.
See? Perfectly reasonable.
48 posted on
12/15/2019 8:19:30 PM PST by
dsc
(That makes absolutely no sense.)
To: Sacajaweau
“The House rule does not require me to schedule a hearing on a particular day, nor does it require me to schedule the hearing as a condition precedent to taking any specific legislative action.”
And there is no recourse that can be taken by anyone except the voters, who will proceed to return this POS to office.
87 posted on
12/16/2019 4:47:24 AM PST by
EQAndyBuzz
(When you think about what the left is doing to America, think no further than Cloward-Piven)
To: Sacajaweau
Even the Soviets communist party members think this is unfair.
110 posted on
12/16/2019 2:39:14 PM PST by
minnesota_bound
(homeless guy. He just has more money....)
To: Sacajaweau; Chode
Sure it does, just in the same way “we must pass this bill so that we can find out what’s in it.”
116 posted on
12/17/2019 11:02:29 AM PST by
mabarker1
((Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!! A fraud, a hypocrite, a liar. I'm a member of Congress !!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson