Posted on 05/11/2020 10:50:20 AM PDT by PROCON
High-school athletes Selina Soule and Alanna Smith (Photo courtesy Alliance Defending Freedom)
Attorneys representing three female high school track athletes in their effort to bar biological males from competing against them filed a motion on Saturday calling for the presiding judge to recuse himself after he forbid the attorneys from referring to the transgender athletes at issue as males.
The ADF filed suit in February against the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (CIAC) on behalf of three girls Selina Soule, Alana Smith, and Chelsea Mitchell. The suit challenges the CIAC policy allowing students to compete in the division that accords with their gender identity on the grounds that it disadvantages women in violation of the Title IX prohibition against discrimination on the basis of sex.
~~~SNIP~~~
{Judge) Chatigny:
What Im saying is you must refer to them as transgender females rather than as males. Again, thats the more accurate terminology, and I think that it fully protects your clients legitimate interests. Referring to these individuals as transgender females is consistent with science, common practice and perhaps human decency. To refer to them as males, period, is not accurate, certainly not as accurate, and I think its needlessly provocative. I dont think that you surrender any legitimate interest or position if you refer to them as transgender females...
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
So refer to them as “biological males” and “biological females”.
Clear it up for the judge. You aren’t talking about their gender identity; you are talking about their biological state.
If the GOP regains the house, they should pass a bill preventing biological males from participating in female sports simply by declaring themselves trans women.
The people that would upset would never vote GOP anyway—never.
On the other hand, there are plenty of swing voters who would be drawn to the GOP by it.
Consistent with science? So is that to say that a reasonably skilled molecular biologist couldn’t look at blood/tissue samples from these guys and know that it was from guys who has been pumped full of estrogen?
I know. The sensor was well into the “safe” range.
The only picture I see is of two young attractive females who are fighting for sanity.
Ooooh My
There once was a time when gender issues were specifically labeled and diagnosed in the DSM-V. A sane judge would respectfully say GTFO of my courtroom.
If the judge forces you to use the insane redefinitions of terms liberals have created, then he’s obviously in favor of said policies.
This is like requiring someone to use the terms “credibly accused” against Kavanaugh if it went to trial instead of saying, “the accuser”. It sets the emotional tone and poisons the well.
“The pic is an easy test for ones TransGenDAR.”
Those are the plaintiffs.
One needs to test positive, negative, false positive and false negative....
On the one hand this is surreal, on the other hand the Title IX affirmative action “feminists” are reaping what they have sown.
When I read about the feminists being mad about the transgender females, or the lesbians being mad about the trans males or feminists, or the trans males mad at the women, it reminds me of the many times in the Bible where the Lord caused confusion among the enemy and they ended up fighting and destroying themselves.
Call them double X people...for the two XX chromosomes that they cannot alter.
If they were born male they are male and will die male despite hormone treatment and bodily mutilation. No goofy democratic judge can change fact.
Looks like he just finished his Richard Gere gerbil trick. ;-)
Yeah, the term "faggot" works just fine.
girls....keep up the good fight....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.