On Daca, Obama Can but Trump Can’t. The Supreme Court endorses a double regulatory standard.

Wall Street Journal ^ | June 18, 2020 | WSJ Editorial Board

[MinuteGal]

Did Ruth Vader Ginsbug vote on these critical decisions?

Was she present at the Court or did she send her vote in by Western Union?

Leni

[MadMax, the Grinning Reaper]

Is Roberts going “mental or was he always a “closet legal crazy”?

[Lurkinanloomin]

The court found that which was never legal could not be undone.

Sort of like the entire Kenyanesian Usurpation.

We live in an upside down world.

When words have no meaning the Constitution is an illusion.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Like Gorsuch?

[MAGAthon]

the big takeaway for the FakeNewsMSM is “arbitrary and capricious”. that was the headline in Australia too. thought they were talking about all the lockdown/shut-down orders from the Dem Governors etc:

19 Jun: NBC: Supreme Court blocks Trump from ending DACA in big win for Dreamers
by Pete Williams & Adam Edelman
In his decision, Roberts called the Trump administration’s “total rescission” of DACA “arbitrary and capricious.”...

Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, vowed, if elected, to “immediately work to make it permanent by sending a bill to Congress on Day One of my administration.”...
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., choked up on the Senate floor moments after the Supreme Court announced its decision.
Schumer said he “cried tears of joy”...
Apple CEO Tim Cook lauded the decision...

Former President Barack Obama, who put DACA into place by executive order in 2012, also applauded the decision and urged Americans to vote for his former vice president, Biden, in November because he would create a “system that’s truly worthy of this nation of immigrants once and for all.”...
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rules-trump-cannot-end-daca-big-win-dreamer-n1115116

[MadMax, the Grinning Reaper]

#4. No. He cannot ignore the ruling but the Court gave him an “out” in that the government can rework their DACA rulings.

That should be the way to go, all the way back to the Supreme Court which would look like shit if they turned down their own solution to the legal issues before them.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Roberts swore in the ineligible Kenyan twice, both times.
Why was a second one done in private each time?

[xkaydet65]

No he cannot. But what DoJ should do IMO is to use the APA against DACA. If Trump’s action was in violation of APA’s protocols, so was Obama’s action in declaring DACA as none of the requirements of the APA were followed by Obama.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Daca was never tested in court,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Because the Bush League Republican leadership in Congress refused to sue to stop it.

The states had to sue to stop the usurper’s SECOND illegal program, DAPA, in which the usurper sought to extend protection from our laws to the parents of DACA eligible illegal aliens.

They are all STILL illegal aliens.

[FreedomVsControl]

If Trump gets reelected, should Trump start telling the Surpreme Court to shove it and do what he wants anyway? Absolutely.

It’s about time we have someone provide checks and balances against their stupid and corrupt decisions.

[Dick Bachert]

Roberts is most likely compromised. Speculation is rife that SWAMP KNOWS that the Chief Justice VIOLATED THE ADOPTION LAWS OF IRELAND and has used the threat of public disclosure of that to secure FAVORABLE RULINGS from him and those on the court over whom he has some influence. The first such was their ludicrous ruling that Obamacare penalties were a TAX. And the second occurred earlier, when the court TOTALLY IGNORED THE LANGUAGE OF THE ACA to rule as it did. That tortured ruling has caused numerous legal commentators -- Judge Napolitano among them -- to opine that words no longer have meanings. While his brutal murder of the supreme organic law of America goes unnoticed by the leftist (aka “COMMUNIST”) media, how unseemly would it be to have the CJ of the SCOTUS known as a common scofflaw? I guess everyone has a price.

[Dogbert41]

Spot on!

[Chgogal]

Someone need to do a deep search on Roberts. His legal decisions terribly illogical. There is something terribly wrong.

[Chgogal]

A deep dive on Roberts has to be made. His legal reasoning is illogical.

[hal ogen]

The “supreme” court hasn’t been so supreme of late. What a pathetic joke .

[zerosix]

Ginsburg and Breyer might be enough but with Trump’s two, so far, I’m not convinced at least one, if not two, might be “sleepers!”

[SunkenCiv]

• Trump:"These horrible & politically charged decisions coming out of the Supreme Court are shotgun blasts into the face of people that are proud to call themselves Republicans or Conservatives."
• DOJ to unveil plans to strip tech giants of protection from being sued over content on their platforms after Donald Trump accused Google, Facebook and Twitter of anti-conservative bias
• Justice Department to Propose Limiting Internet Firms' Protections. The action follows President Trump's executive order seeking to weaken broad immunity enjoyed by Facebook, Twitter and other platforms.
• Trump says he 'absolutely' would support Colin Kaepernick getting second shot in NFL despite kneeling controversy.
• Remarks by President Trump at Announcement of PREVENTS Task Force Roadmap
• Trump Looking to Replace $600 Unemployment Benefit With Back-to-Work Bonus
• This Leftist Tantrum Is an Information Operation and Trump Is Winning It
• GOP: Trump fourth greatest president ever, near equal to Reagan

[Varsity Flight]

Roberts has Bush tattooed all-over.

[lgjhn23]

“...Can Trump just ignore such a “ruling”?...”
Dunno why not...oDongo, The messiah, certainly did.
This decision should help in the next SCOTUS pick once the Reaper comes to “harvest” Lil’ Ruthie, which we pray to happen any day now. Trump can now select the most conservative candidate possible and put force on the issue based on this decision.

[Safrguns]

Impeachable