Replies

hang this 3-judge panel

seriously

4 posted on 07/31/2020 8:30:45 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)

5 posted on 07/31/2020 8:34:46 PM PDT by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.)

To: Secret Agent Man

I can’t argue with you on that

6 posted on 07/31/2020 8:36:10 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there..)

To: Secret Agent Man

EXACTLY! And him. When is justice coming for Nidal Malik Hasan (Ft. Hood)?

No justice, no republic, no civilization.

10 posted on 07/31/2020 9:07:26 PM PDT by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)

To: Secret Agent Man

Hold on the hanging for a minute. Why? Because this court may just have handed Roger Stone a precedent decision that could get his decision/conviction for perjury etc. thrown out.

His jury forewoman was both a Democrat Party official and financial contributor but failed to put that on her jury form (if I’ve got the procedure correctly) or to fill it out completely.

The judge refused to throw out the decision once this deception was made known and empanel a new jury despite the judge/courts staff to adequately vet potential jurists.

Instead of singing “Tradition”, we should be singing “Precedents” re the Stone case. (I have no love for Stone but I want everyone to get a fair jury and a fair trial, which seems to be in short supply when it comes to Papadopoulus, Flynn, Stone and others).

15 posted on 07/31/2020 10:23:25 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794