couldn't vote for Trump in 2016, needed 100% proof that Trump would be prolife, therefore gave half a vote to Hillary, sounds smart
Why should I bother to read about how some Never Trumper was wrong?
“Look at Me! I’m a doofus who was wrong! Let me tell you about how wrong I was!!”
Until Trump, this country has not had a President that worked FOR AMERICA AND ITS PEOPLE for a long time. And now you do.
So the choice is easy if you want a REAL PRESIDENT. VOTE TRUMP OR VOTE A RUINED UNITED STATES. EASY CHOICE.
It’s good to hear!
There is a point in time when the Judeans, with the enemy practically beating at their doors, chose to publicly repent of how they had held their fellow Israelites in bondage in violation of the Law.
As a consequence the Lord removed the enemy whereupon these same people again threw their former slaves back into slavey.
... and the enemy came back....
The point is that all that Trump is doing on abortion has been good but there is a huge danger in anything like taking back repentance that cannot be overstated.
Abortion is essentially the religious offerings of the Left and they are arguably more attached to protecting it than even defending homosexuality Romans 1:18-32 style. If they get power they will do everything to reverse anything Trump has managed to do and the condemnation that they bring on us collectively will not be anything any rational person would want.
It isn’t then that we need to keep going forward against abortion for 4 years but that we need to do so period.
After all, they already killed Scalia just to pd the Court numbers even when everyone was sure Hillary would win. What would they do, who would they kill, to reverse Trump?
This guy is a clown. Abortion is a big issue, but it is not the only big issue we are facing. There is nothing biden and camel-toe would do to make America better for 95% of the population. But, just like dems did in Colorado and California, they would change the voting system guaranteeing democrat victories forever. That would make America look like Venezuela in less then a decade. And don’t pin your hopes on a civil war restoring America. Most American’s no longer have that in them, and the ones that do will be put down immediately. JMHO
I guess old hacks can change tracks. 8>)
Good article. Sadly there will still be Puritans who complain “Trump hasn’t done enough” .
Mr. Newman...next time just listen to us.
Mr. Newman, I would be embarrassed to admit to the world via your article that I was too damn stupid to see the differences between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Just their respective and immediate families alone should have been a clue for you.
I think it’s a bad idea for Democrats to procreate. We feed, they breed.
One amazing thing I’ve noticed: the correlation between being pro-life and being solid on almost every other issue is extraordinary.
I don’t know but I suppose it’s because you have to be an independent thinker and have backbone to defend life these days, those characteristics help you navigate most other issues pretty well.
His pro-life stand was the final factor in my decision to support him.
I was for him before that because he was not a career politician, but during the third debate when he made that clear commitment to the pro-life position, that did it for me.
Additionally, the economy was doing well, judges are being appointed, the wall if being built, he called for a national day of prayer for the corona virus outbreak, and he’s very pro-Israel.
Well, there’s enough there for me to support him again. So no, I’m not a single issue voter. He’s done enough that I’d support him over any dem liberal commie any day of the week without giving it as second thought.
> “Like many Americans, Donald Trump’s public persona often grates on me.”
This is a programmed mantra of weak self-declared Republicans. When challenged on such assertions, they struggle to make a case.
Trump’s general transparency includes his locker room expressions and emotionally justified language that Americans understand and identify with. Those arrogant asses looking down their noses at the American electorate think of themselves too highly and are forced eventually to admit their mistakes as this never-trumper has done.
Yes, Trump is pro-life, the most pro-life President in our lifetimes. Yes, he’s conservative. Yes, he’s honest. We don’t care if he acts like a baseball manager in the dugout muttering expletives at an empire who can’t call it right. He’s real to us, he has grit and we’re not going to let effeminate tongue twisters and shrill harridans dominate our social dialog.
So there was Trump who said he would defend the unborn and Hilary who was openly open-abortion and said she would see that nothing ever would limit abortions. And since he wasn’t sure Trump was telling the truth he allowed Hilary to seek election without his own opposition. Yeah, that makes sense.
That’s the sort of “principled stand” that helps the RATs every time.
This single issue crap is a disease. Yeah. Trump wasn’t particularly pro-2nd amendment either. So gun owners should have let Hilary run without their opposition even though she promised strict gun control.
Morons.
Marc Newman disgusts me. I voted for TRUMP as opposed to a Clinton..
Now I am glad I did, and will vote for TRUMP again come November!!!
I’ve seen this with a lot of Christians. They could never vote for someone like Trump who is so rude, divisive, the whole litany. The problem being that they get their news and analysis from the alphabet networks and don’t see the depravity of the people he is up against.
The point of this article is that a lot of these people have started to come around. They’ve seen that he is solid. He keeps his word. They’ve seen the accusations against him come to nothing. And at some point they do figure out that his enemies are really bad people. Most “never Trumpers”, especially those of a religious persuasion, have come around. The well known “never Trumpers” I always suspect of being bought and paid for, and they aren’t going to come around, and you couldn’t trust them if they did.
“Defunding Planned Parenthood didn’t happen, but not because of Trump. It failed because two Republican senators, Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins, voted “no” when the measure came up.”
This is a clear case of TRIBALISM - never forget it. We can elect women (or people from other ‘groups’) who claim to be conservative, but when it come to showing their backbone against ‘their own’, forget it. But it’s not the end of the world for us, since they are helpful in many other areas (for example, if a Democrat had been in the Senate instead of Collins, Kavenaugh would NOT be on the Supreme Court), but it is a cost to Republicans of trying to branch out a bit and pull in other types.
So my point being is that if Collins is with us 80% of the time, and, say (Amnesty-lover) Rubio is also with us 80% of the time, we’ll get at least one of these votes 95% of the time - whereas we’ll get at least one of these votes 0% of the time, if Dems are in these seats.
So who did he vote for in 2016 if not Trump?